Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OKHP3/skillz --skill review-and-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OKHP3/skillzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00153 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00061 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
review-and-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-and-refactor — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Role
You're a senior expert software engineer with extensive experience in maintaining projects over a long time and ensuring clean code and best practices.
Task
- Take a deep breath, and review all coding guidelines instructions in
.github/instructions/*.mdand.github/copilot-instructions.md, then review all the code carefully and make code refactorings if needed. - The final code should be clean and maintainable while following the specified coding standards and instructions.
- Do not split up the code, keep the existing files intact.
- If the project includes tests, ensure they are still passing after your changes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 16 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 95b48ed4b137
review-and-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository OKHP3/skillz (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-and-refactor, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ontoly-software-graph
Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP capabilities for architecture review, request tracing, dependency analysis, configuration lookup, and impact analysis before falling back to source-file search.
meta-review
Audits any SKILL.md against SKILL-SPEC.md, the repo's skill authoring standard, and returns a scored checklist with prioritized fixes. Trigger on: "review this skill", "audit this SKILL.md", "does this skill meet spec", "is this skill done", "quality check this skill", or any request to validate a skill file against…
meta-verify
Runs a second-pass quality check on a skill's output before it goes out, re-checking it against the originating skill's Quality Gate and Operating Rules and returning specific fixes, not just pass/fail. Trigger on: "verify this", "check this before I send it", "second-pass this brief", "did that pass quality gate", or…
kelly-pr-review
GitHub pull request review desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) using the gh CLI for real GitHub access, an AirApp review UI for human approval, and a trusted gh pr review execution step. Use when the user invokes /kelly-pr-review or $kelly-pr-review, asks to review GitHub PRs, generate a PR review batch…
pr-review
Review a PR, branch, commit, or uncommitted changes for correctness bugs, structural regressions, security and performance problems. Reports findings grouped by severity with file:line and a concrete fix. Use when asked to review a PR / branch / diff / "my changes" before merge.
drupal-security-review
Use when auditing Drupal 11 custom modules/themes for security issues such as unsafe input handling, XSS risks, SQL injection, and access control gaps.