Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OKHP3/skillz --skill review-and-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OKHP3/skillzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/okhp3/skillz/review-and-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
review-and-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-and-refactor — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Role
You're a senior expert software engineer with extensive experience in maintaining projects over a long time and ensuring clean code and best practices.
Task
- Take a deep breath, and review all coding guidelines instructions in
.github/instructions/*.mdand.github/copilot-instructions.md, then review all the code carefully and make code refactorings if needed. - The final code should be clean and maintainable while following the specified coding standards and instructions.
- Do not split up the code, keep the existing files intact.
- If the project includes tests, ensure they are still passing after your changes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 16 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 95b48ed4b137
review-and-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository OKHP3/skillz (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-and-refactor, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ontoly-software-graph
Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP capabilities for architecture review, request tracing, dependency analysis, configuration lookup, and impact analysis before falling back to source-file search.
kelly-pr-review
GitHub pull request review desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) using the gh CLI for real GitHub access, an AirApp review UI for human approval, and a trusted gh pr review execution step. Use when the user invokes /kelly-pr-review or $kelly-pr-review, asks to review GitHub PRs, generate a PR review batch…
drupal-security-review
Use when auditing Drupal 11 custom modules/themes for security issues such as unsafe input handling, XSS risks, SQL injection, and access control gaps.
find-verified-code-review-agent
Find a Verified Code Review Agent. Agent discovery, trust verification, and capability routing powered by Aidress — the coordination registry for autonomous AI agents. Use for software agent discovery, trust verification, and capability routing — via Aidress (https://api.aidress.ai).
baoyu-comic
A tool for creating original educational comics that explain knowledge or ideas through multiple illustrated panels. It supports different art styles and tones and can create several comics in one batch.
refactor-advisor
A code review helper that finds common design and maintenance problems in a codebase and suggests ways to restructure the code.