Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/oleg494/coding-kit/observability-and-instrumentationnpx skills add oleg494/coding-kit --skill observability-and-instrumentationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oleg494/coding-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/observability-and-instrumentation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/observability-and-instrumentation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/observability-and-instrumentation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00066 | $0.00969 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00485 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
observability-and-instrumentation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Observability and Instrumentation
Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are.
When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production
- Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
- A production incident took too long to diagnose
- Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
Process
1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why?
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.
2. Pick the right signal
| Signal | Answers | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Structured log | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event |
| Metric | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series |
| Trace | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request, sampled |
Rule: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.
3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name:
// BAD: logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId}`);
// GOOD:
logger.warn({
event: 'payment_failed',
paymentId: id,
provider: 'stripe',
errorCode: err.code,
attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');
Log levels:
| Level | Meaning | On-call action |
|---|---|---|
error |
Invariant broken | Investigate |
warn |
Degraded but handled | Watch for trends |
info |
Significant business event | None |
debug |
Diagnostic detail | Off in production |
Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate/accept a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 110 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A f118e5b811e9
observability-and-instrumentation is a skill published in the GitHub repository oleg494/coding-kit (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 969 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
run
Execute a named agent role with optimized instructions. Explicit invocation only ($run). Never trigger implicitly.
tip
Deliver a transformative life perspective shift and a productivity tip. Use when the user invokes /tip or wants non-technical inspiration or a fresh mental model.
agentic-spec
Create a structured specification before agentic coding work. Assemble the six context types, scale rigor for prototype/internal/production tasks, produce SPEC.md, and configure focused AGENTS.md boundaries. Use when asked to write a spec, plan a feature, design an agent/system, define architecture, or create…
agentic-evals
Design evaluation contracts and test plans for agentic systems. Create deterministic tests, trajectory evals, quality dimensions, gold-set criteria, and CI gates before or after implementation. Use when asked for tests first, an eval plan, success criteria, non-deterministic testing, LLM-as-judge setup, or…
agentic-production-readiness
Prepare an AI agent system for production operation. Cover SHIELD controls, sandbox/canary/production rollout, OpenTelemetry observability with GenAI semantic conventions, Agent Card drafting, governance, and post-deploy monitoring. Use for production readiness checks, go-live checklists, agent monitoring, agent…
agentic-security-review
Run a security and dependency audit for agent systems, tool-using AI apps, MCP/A2A integrations, or security-sensitive AI-generated code. Check slopsquatting risk, tool shadowing, rug pulls, memory/context poisoning, secrets, unsafe permissions, and common CWE patterns. Use when asked for security review, dependency…