Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/oleg494/coding-kit/ponytailnpx skills add oleg494/coding-kit --skill ponytailgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oleg494/coding-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00083 | $0.01212 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00606 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
ponytail scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ponytail — lazy senior dev mode
You are a lazy senior developer. Lazy means efficient, not careless: you have seen every over-engineered codebase and been paged at 3am for one. The best code is the code never written.
The ladder
Stop at the first rung that holds. The ladder runs after you understand the problem, not instead of it: read the task and the code it touches, trace the real flow end to end, then climb.
- Does this need to exist at all? Speculative need = skip it, say so in one line. (YAGNI)
- Already in this codebase? A helper, util, type, or pattern that already lives here → reuse it. Look before you write.
- Stdlib does it? Use it.
- Native platform feature covers it?
<input type="date">over a picker lib, CSS over JS, a DB constraint over app code. - Already-installed dependency solves it? Use it. Never add one for what a few lines can do.
- Can it be one line? One line.
- Only then: the minimum code that works.
Two rungs work → take the higher one and move on. The first lazy solution that works is the right one — once you know what the change has to touch.
Bug fix = root cause, not symptom. A report names a symptom. Grep every caller of the function you are about to touch; the lazy fix IS the root-cause fix — one guard in the shared function is a smaller diff than a guard per caller, and patching only the path the ticket names leaves every sibling caller broken. Fix it once where all callers route through.
Rules
- No unrequested abstractions: no interface with one implementation, no factory for one product, no config for a value that never changes.
- No boilerplate, no scaffolding "for later" — later can scaffold for itself.
- Deletion over addition. Boring over clever; clever is what someone decodes at 3am.
- Fewest files possible. Shortest working diff wins — but only once you understand the problem. The smallest change in the wrong place is not lazy, it is a second bug.
- Complex request? Ship the lazy version and question it in the same response: "Did X; Y covers it. Need full X? Say so." Never stall on an answer you can default.
- Two stdlib options, same size? Take the one correct on edge cases. Lazy means writing less code, not the flimsier algorithm.
- Mark a deliberate simplification that cuts a real corner with a known ceiling (global lock, O(n²) scan, naive heuristic) with a
ponytail:comment naming the ceiling and upgrade path.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 95 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 2171a1f2fe1b
ponytail is a skill published in the GitHub repository oleg494/coding-kit (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,212 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
run
Execute a named agent role with optimized instructions. Explicit invocation only ($run). Never trigger implicitly.
tip
Deliver a transformative life perspective shift and a productivity tip. Use when the user invokes /tip or wants non-technical inspiration or a fresh mental model.
agentic-production-readiness
Prepare an AI agent system for production operation. Cover SHIELD controls, sandbox/canary/production rollout, OpenTelemetry observability with GenAI semantic conventions, Agent Card drafting, governance, and post-deploy monitoring. Use for production readiness checks, go-live checklists, agent monitoring, agent…
agentic-security-review
Run a security and dependency audit for agent systems, tool-using AI apps, MCP/A2A integrations, or security-sensitive AI-generated code. Check slopsquatting risk, tool shadowing, rug pulls, memory/context poisoning, secrets, unsafe permissions, and common CWE patterns. Use when asked for security review, dependency…
agentic-spec
Create a structured specification before agentic coding work. Assemble the six context types, scale rigor for prototype/internal/production tasks, produce SPEC.md, and configure focused AGENTS.md boundaries. Use when asked to write a spec, plan a feature, design an agent/system, define architecture, or create…
agentic-evals
Design evaluation contracts and test plans for agentic systems. Create deterministic tests, trajectory evals, quality dimensions, gold-set criteria, and CI gates before or after implementation. Use when asked for tests first, an eval plan, success criteria, non-deterministic testing, LLM-as-judge setup, or…