security-and-hardening

security-and-hardening is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from oleg494/coding-kit. It costs 65 tokens per session (1,106 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security-development guide for protecting applications that handle outside input, accounts, private data, or third-party services.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when building features such as authentication, file uploads, webhooks, payments, API integrations, or other functionality involving sensitive data.
Why use it?
It helps identify where untrusted data enters the system and where credentials, personal information, or privileged actions could be exposed or misused.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/oleg494/coding-kit/security-and-hardening
Any agent
npx skills add oleg494/coding-kit --skill security-and-hardening
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oleg494/coding-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-and-hardening

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/security-and-hardening.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/security-and-hardening)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/security-and-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oleg494/coding-kit/security-and-hardening.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 65 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,106 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00065 $0.01106
Opus 5 $0.00032 $0.00553
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00221
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00111

Measured 4d ago against content hash 3f67ba80b8a3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-and-hardening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/security-and-hardening/SKILL.md · 129 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security and Hardening

Overview

Security-first development practices. Treat every external input as hostile, every secret as sacred, and every authorization check as mandatory.

When to Use

  • Building anything that accepts user input
  • Implementing authentication or authorization
  • Storing or transmitting sensitive data
  • Integrating with external APIs or services
  • Adding file uploads, webhooks, or callbacks
  • Handling payment or PII data

Process: Threat Model First

  1. Map the trust boundaries. Where does untrusted data cross into your system? HTTP requests, form fields, file uploads, webhooks, third-party APIs, message queues, LLM output.
  2. Name the assets. Credentials, PII, payment data, admin actions, money movement.
  3. Run STRIDE over each boundary:
    • Spoofing → authentication, signature verification
    • Tampering → integrity checks, parameterized queries, HTTPS
    • Repudiation → audit logging
    • Information disclosure → encryption, field allowlists, generic errors
    • Denial of service → rate limiting, input size caps, timeouts
    • Elevation of privilege → authorization checks, least privilege

The Three-Tier Boundary System

Always Do (No Exceptions)

  • Validate all external input at system boundary
  • Parameterize all database queries
  • Encode output to prevent XSS
  • Use HTTPS for all external communication
  • Hash passwords with bcrypt/scrypt/argon2
  • Set security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)
  • Use httpOnly, secure, sameSite cookies for sessions

Ask First (Requires Human Approval)

  • Adding new authentication flows
  • Storing new categories of sensitive data
  • Adding new external service integrations
  • Changing CORS configuration
  • Adding file upload handlers
  • Modifying rate limiting

Never Do

  • Never commit secrets to version control
  • Never log sensitive data (passwords, tokens, full credit cards)
  • Never trust client-side validation as a security boundary
  • Never use eval() or innerHTML with user-provided data
  • Never store sessions in client-accessible storage
  • Never expose stack traces to users

Read the full file on GitHub · 129 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 129 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 3f67ba80b8a3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-and-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository oleg494/coding-kit (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,106 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

run

Execute a named agent role with optimized instructions. Explicit invocation only ($run). Never trigger implicitly.

mystilleef/spae-framework · 21 tokens

tip

Deliver a transformative life perspective shift and a productivity tip. Use when the user invokes /tip or wants non-technical inspiration or a fresh mental model.

mystilleef/spae-framework · 32 tokens

agentic-production-readiness

Prepare an AI agent system for production operation. Cover SHIELD controls, sandbox/canary/production rollout, OpenTelemetry observability with GenAI semantic conventions, Agent Card drafting, governance, and post-deploy monitoring. Use for production readiness checks, go-live checklists, agent monitoring, agent…

browoz/agentic-sdlc-skills · 97 tokens

agentic-security-review

Run a security and dependency audit for agent systems, tool-using AI apps, MCP/A2A integrations, or security-sensitive AI-generated code. Check slopsquatting risk, tool shadowing, rug pulls, memory/context poisoning, secrets, unsafe permissions, and common CWE patterns. Use when asked for security review, dependency…

browoz/agentic-sdlc-skills · 106 tokens

agentic-spec

Create a structured specification before agentic coding work. Assemble the six context types, scale rigor for prototype/internal/production tasks, produce SPEC.md, and configure focused AGENTS.md boundaries. Use when asked to write a spec, plan a feature, design an agent/system, define architecture, or create…

browoz/agentic-sdlc-skills · 91 tokens

agentic-evals

Design evaluation contracts and test plans for agentic systems. Create deterministic tests, trajectory evals, quality dimensions, gold-set criteria, and CI gates before or after implementation. Use when asked for tests first, an eval plan, success criteria, non-deterministic testing, LLM-as-judge setup, or…

browoz/agentic-sdlc-skills · 95 tokens