pull-request

pull-request is a skill for Claude Code from olehsvyrydov/AI-development-team. It costs 78 tokens per session (1,190 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A pull-request workflow guide for taking a change from review through merge. A pull request is a proposed code change where reviewers discuss the change and automated checks run before it is added to the project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when opening, updating, reviewing, or merging pull requests, especially when replying to review threads and checking each workflow run.
Why use it?
It prevents unresolved review questions and unchecked or misleading CI results from being treated as finished work. It also checks that the merged result is the same code the checks tested.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the ai-dev-team plugin — 43 skills, 50 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it when opening, updating, reviewing, or merging pull requests, especially when replying to review threads and checking each workflow run.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add olehsvyrydov/AI-development-team --skill pull-request
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/olehsvyrydov/AI-development-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ai-dev-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 43 skills, 50 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pull-request

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pull-request

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/pull-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 78 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,190 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00078 $0.01190
Opus 5.5 $0.00031 $0.00476
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00238
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00119

Measured today against content hash 643c1cde8713, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

claude/skills/pull-request/SKILL.md · 95 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pull requests — nothing is left dangling

A PR is finished when every question raised on it has an answer and every check that gates it has actually run. Both halves get skipped in the same way: by reading a summary instead of the thing itself.

The rule: never leave a review conversation open

Every review thread on a PR must be resolved before merge — no exceptions, including threads you disagree with and threads that have become obsolete. An open thread is an unanswered question, and a merged PR with open threads tells the next reader that nobody decided.

Resolving does not mean agreeing. There are exactly three honest outcomes, and each needs a reply before the thread is resolved:

Outcome Reply must say
Fixed which commit, and what now enforces it (the symbol, not the intention)
Won't fix why, specifically — cost, scope, or a rule that outranks it — not "by design"
Obsolete why it no longer applies, e.g. the code it names was deleted

Resolving silently is the failure mode to avoid: it looks identical to fixing it, and the reviewer cannot tell which happened.

Check for threads with the API — the PR page summary and gh pr view do not list unresolved threads, so a PR can look clean while carrying several:

gh api graphql -f query='
{ repository(owner:"OWNER", name:"REPO") {
    pullRequest(number:NN) {
      reviewThreads(last:60) { nodes { id isResolved isOutdated path
        comments(last:1){nodes{author{login} body}} } }
    } } }' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[]
                 | select(.isResolved==false) | "\(.path) | \(.comments.nodes[0].body[0:160])"'

Reply, then resolve:

gh api graphql -f query='mutation { addPullRequestReviewThreadReply(
  input:{pullRequestReviewThreadId:"THREAD_ID", body:"..."}) { clientMutationId } }'
gh api graphql -f query='mutation { resolveReviewThread(
  input:{threadId:"THREAD_ID"}) { thread { isResolved } } }'

Read the full file on GitHub · 95 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 95 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 643c1cde8713

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository olehsvyrydov/AI-development-team (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,190 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-19.