Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add olehsvyrydov/AI-development-team --skill workflow-enginegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/olehsvyrydov/AI-development-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/workflow-engine)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/workflow-engine"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/workflow-engine/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/workflow-engine"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olehsvyrydov/ai-development-team/workflow-engine.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00140 | $0.01227 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00056 | $0.00491 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-engine scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow Engine — how the team works
You enforce the team's workflow. The authoritative definition lives in workflow.yaml (resolved first-found: ./.aidevteam/workflow.yaml → ~/.aidevteam/workflow.yaml → the framework default in this repo's claude/workflow/workflow.yaml). Load that file when a task starts — do not paraphrase the process from memory.
Do this at the start of every task and before every handoff
- Load
workflow.yaml. Note the activepresetand itsalways_requiredgates. - Classify the change → pick the matching
track. Right-size it:- trivial (typo/comment/rename) →
floor_min; small (one file, no new deps) →floor; standard (a feature/story) →standard; significant (new service/dependency/schema/boundary, or anything security-sensitive) →full.
- trivial (typo/comment/rename) →
- Detect gate triggers from the change and require those gates even on a small change:
- auth/secrets/PII/upload/external-input/network/crypto → SECOPS_APPROVED; new dep/schema/service/boundary/public API → ARCH_APPROVED; visual change/new screen → DESIGN_APPROVED; etc.
- Security is a safety override: never skip SECOPS for being a "small" change.
- Check the ledger for gates already passed on this ticket (
.workflow-state.json→ Backlog.md → workflow MCP → Jira; first available wins — seereferences/ledger.md). - Enforce. Before crossing a gate it must be
passed:refusal: hard+ unmet → STOP. Do not proceed. Name the gate and invoke its owner: e.g. "Blocked: SECOPS_APPROVED required — handing to /secops."refusal: soft+ unmet → warn, record the skip + reason, may proceed.
- Record every gate result and status transition to the ledger (and a ticket note) as you go.
Proportionality (why the workflow stops getting ignored)
The default preset: solo forces nothing — gates fire only on trigger or change-class, so a solo dev gets a light path and won't route a typo through architecture + security. small-team adds always-on code review; regulated runs the full gauntlet and uses Jira/Confluence. Switch by editing preset: in workflow.yaml.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 47 lines · 140 tokens per session scan A 0177965dce56
workflow-engine is a skill published in the GitHub repository olehsvyrydov/AI-development-team (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 140 tokens to every session and 1,227 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-19.
Other skills, from other repositories
bf-clarify
Use when brownfield analysis has open inferences or gaps that need human answers.
bf-rebuild-plan
Use when brownfield analysis is done and the app must become an ordered rebuild backlog.
bf-ui
Use when a rebuild must keep the legacy UI's screens and visual theme.
loop
Use when asked to loop or iterate a change until every gate is green.
bf-blueprint
Use when a rebuild's decisions and backlog exist and the target architecture must be drawn.
debug
Use when a bug, test failure, build failure, or unexpected behaviour is reported or observed, before proposing any fix.