review

review is a skill for Claude Code from oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix. It costs 51 tokens per session (2,294 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for Elixir and Phoenix projects, using focused checks for tests, security, database code, LiveView, background jobs, and deployment settings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed files, test code, security rules, background workers, deployment configuration, or a specific plan.
Why use it?
It helps find bugs and risky patterns after implementation, before changes are committed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the phx plugin — 50 skills, 26 agents, 8 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to review changed files, test code, security rules, background workers, deployment configuration, or a specific plan.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install phx, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 50 skills, 26 agents, 8 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,294 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.02294
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00918
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00459
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00229

Measured 26d ago against content hash 2ec044d90e42, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/elixir-phoenix/skills/review/SKILL.md · 186 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Elixir/Phoenix Code

Review code by spawning parallel specialist agents. Find and explain issues — do NOT create tasks or fix anything.

Usage

/phx:review                          # Auto-detects task ID from branch/commits
/phx:review test                     # Review test files only
/phx:review security                 # Run security audit only
/phx:review oban                     # Review Oban workers only
/phx:review deploy                   # Validate deployment config
/phx:review iron-laws                # Check Iron Law violations only
/phx:review ENA-8931                 # Force Linear issue
/phx:review #42                      # Force GitHub issue
/phx:review .claude/plans/auth/plan.md    # Force plan / spec file
/phx:review --no-requirements        # Skip requirements coverage check
/phx:review --codex                  # Add Codex CLI as cross-model reviewer

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS = Focus area, task ID, or path to plan/spec file.

When no requirements argument is passed, the skill auto-detects a task ID from the branch and recent commits (see ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/requirements-detection.md).

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Changed Files and Prepare Directories

Create output dirs before spawning agents — agents cannot create directories, so their writes would fail.

  1. Determine SLUG via Glob on .claude/plans/*/ (default: "review")
  2. Run mkdir -p ".claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews" ".claude/plans/${SLUG}/summaries" .claude/reviews
  3. Run git diff --name-only HEAD~5 and git diff --name-only main
  4. Save the diff base for pre-existing detection in Step 3b

Step 1b: Load Plan Context and Prior Reviews

  • Read .claude/plans/${SLUG}/scratchpad.md for planning decisions and rationale
  • Pass relevant decisions to agents as WHY-context (eliminates session archaeology)
  • Check .claude/plans/${SLUG}/reviews/ for prior output; if present, include a consolidated summary as "PRIOR FINDINGS" with: "Focus on NEW issues. Mark still-present issues as PERSISTENT."

Read the full file on GitHub · 186 lines

Files

What ships with it

6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 26d ago Changed 2ec044d90e42
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +17 tokens per session 48d4c87ae940
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 186 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 5c35fdf25e80

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix (570 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 2,294 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

socratic-review

Socratic code review and refactoring session — whether it's your own code, a teammate's PR, or something you inherited. Leads you to see the issues through questions, names smells and moves precisely, then closes with a concrete plan.

thoughtbot/rails-consultant · 51 tokens

prior-art

Discover how a codebase already handles a specific concern — search broadly, find every instance, and assess consistency. The "how does this app do X?" tool.

thoughtbot/rails-consultant · 36 tokens

fable-super-audit

Comprehensive, rubric-driven, whole-repository code audit that ends in a prioritized improvement plan with an executive health grade. Built to run in a premium, time-limited model session (Fable): it dispatches cheaper Opus/Sonnet subagents to explore the codebase and pre-build a project-tailored audit checklist, then…

madisonrickert/claude-skills · 0 tokens

elderly-ui-audit

A code review for making websites and mobile apps easier for older people to use, based on Chinese government accessibility guidelines.

XuYuting133/elderly-ui-audit · 59 tokens

odoo-code-review

Use when reviewing Odoo code — yours before commit, Claude's after generation, or a teammate's PSDU PR. Catches shape-of-bad-code issues that lint won't, plus customer-readiness gaps. Invoke before claiming Odoo work is done.

omas-odoo/odoo-superpowers · 56 tokens

odoo-code-review

Use when reviewing Odoo code — yours before commit, Claude's after generation, or a teammate's PSDU PR. Catches shape-of-bad-code issues that lint won't, plus customer-readiness gaps. Invoke before claiming Odoo work is done.

assoumaaa/odoo-superpowers · 56 tokens