Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ololand-ai/ololand-plugins --skill cmd-conflictsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/cmd-conflicts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/cmd-conflicts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/cmd-conflicts.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.01443 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00722 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
ololand-forensic-qoe-conflicts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex wrapper for /conflicts
Follow the OloLand command instructions below when the user asks for /conflicts or the equivalent workflow in Codex.
/conflicts (cross-document conflict detection)
Runs OloLand's Deal Document Conflict Detector over a deal's ingested documents. It reads the data room against itself and surfaces places where two documents disagree — a revenue figure that differs between the CIM and the audited financials, an ownership percentage that moves between the cap table and the SPA, a close date that conflicts across the LOI and the disclosure schedule. Each conflict is traced to the specific documents (and pages) that disagree, so it is a review item you can act on, not a vibe.
This is the discrepancy-hunting complement to /verify: /verify checks that the figures an artifact states are supported by the corpus; /conflicts hunts for places the corpus contradicts itself.
Usage
/conflicts <deal_id>
Arguments
deal_id(required) — the OloLand deal whose ingested documents to scan. Requires a deal with a populated data room (multiple documents — there is nothing to cross-check in a single file).
Execution
This is an asynchronous managed-agent run. Do not expect an immediate answer; start it, then poll.
- Start. Call
mcp__ololand__run_conflict_detectionwithdeal_id. It returns atask_id(withtask_type: "managed_conflict_detection").- If it returns
{"error": "Deal not found: …", "error_code": "not_found"}— the deal id is wrong; ask the user to confirm it withmcp__ololand__list_deals. - If it returns
{"error": "Company scope required …"}— the MCP connection is not company-scoped (it needs a database-backedolo_agent_sk_*key, which the OloLand connection provides on sign-in). Tell the user to reconnect / sign in, do not retry blindly. - If the tool itself errors (e.g. the managed executor is unavailable) the call fails closed — relay the error rather than presenting an empty "no conflicts" result.
- If it returns
- Poll. Call
mcp__ololand__check_task_statuswith thetask_idevery few seconds. WhilestateisSTARTED/PROGRESS, relay the progress message (it names each engine call, e.g.Engine call: reconcile_documents) so the user sees it working. Keep polling untilstateisSUCCESSorFAILURE. - On
FAILURE— report theerrorverbatim. Do not synthesize a conflict list from nothing. - On
SUCCESS— theresultobject is:status—"success"or"error". Check it: anerrorstatus means the run completed but the agent hit a problem mid-flight.error—nullon success; on anerrorstatus, the message string to relay.text— the conflict report itself: a structured list of conflicts (each with the conflicting sources, the disagreeing values, and a severity) plus a confidence / limitations note. This is the deliverable.run_id— the replayableagent_runsrow.artifact_id— the persistedconflict_reportartifact.tool_calls— how many engine calls the detector made.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 78 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 0e625f62f4e3
ololand-forensic-qoe-conflicts is a skill published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,443 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-support
Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.
kyc-doc-parse
Parse an investor or client onboarding packet into structured KYC fields — identity, ownership, control, source of funds, and document inventory. Use as the first step of KYC screening; output feeds the rules engine.
fiscaliste
Fiscaliste IA pour la fiscalité personnelle des particuliers français : optimisation et déclaration de l'impôt sur le revenu, IFI, revenus du capital, revenus fonciers, equity salarial, crypto-actifs et PER. Couvre le calcul de l'IR (barème, quotient familial, décote, PAS, CEHR, revenus exceptionnels), la déclaration…
regulatory-analysis
Analyzes documents and processes against FINRA, SEC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB regulatory frameworks. Identifies compliance gaps, classifies findings by severity, and recommends remediation. Use when performing compliance audits, regulatory reviews, gap analyses, or verifying policy adherence to financial regulations.
subcontractor-payment-tracker
Track subcontractor payments, lien waivers, and compliance. Manage payment schedules and documentation.
tax-optimizer
Tax optimization strategies including tax-loss harvesting, wash sale rule navigation, asset location optimization, Roth conversion analysis, and charitable giving strategies.