Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ololand-ai/ololand-plugins --skill document-editinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/document-editing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/document-editing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/document-editing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/document-editing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/document-editing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.00812 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00325 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
document-editing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Document Editing (human-approved patches)
OloLand can edit deal documents agentically — but it never commits anything
itself. An editing agent mounts the relevant documents, makes the edits, and
each accepted edit becomes a pending_approval patch that passes four
deterministic verifiers. A human reviews, approves (or rejects) and commits
patches into a new document version. Full provenance: proposer, rationale,
evidence quote, verifier verdicts, approval note, version lineage.
The flow (launch → poll → read → approve)
- Launch:
edit_deal_documents(deal_id, instruction, file_ids?)— returns atask_idimmediately. Costs 10 credits. Sessions take seconds to a couple of minutes. - Poll:
check_task_status(task_id)until completed. - Read:
list_patches(deal_id, status="pending_approval")— patches are DB-backed and stay readable after the task id expires. Each patch carries op, before/after text, evidence, and verifier verdicts. - Approve & commit (HUMAN step): in the web app under
Deal → Document Edits (
/deals/<deal_id>/patches). The MCP rail is fail-closed for human approvals: never callapprove_patchorcommit_versionthrough MCP. Never auto-approve on the user's behalf — surface the pending patches and let the user decide in the app.
Writing instructions that land deterministically
- Quote the exact text to change:
replace "FY2024 revenue of $12.4M" with "FY2024 revenue of $12.6M"beatsfix the revenue figure. - Pin the working set when you know the file: pass
file_idsto skip retrieval-based candidate discovery — faster and unambiguous. - One logical change per instruction. The editing agent keeps each edit inside one paragraph; cross-paragraph rewrites are rejected.
- Repeated text (OCR'd forms, boilerplate): the agent uses replace-all semantics — each occurrence becomes its own patch; the reviewer can approve them individually.
What gets rejected (and why that's the product)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 9bd6d154ec3f
document-editing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 812 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-stencil-tablet
A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.
treatment-plans
Formats and structurally validates local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
handbook-updates
Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
software-copyright-materials
A workflow for creating Chinese application materials for software copyright registration from a real software project.