Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ololand-ai/ololand-plugins --skill forensic-qoegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/forensic-qoe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/forensic-qoe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/forensic-qoe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/forensic-qoe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/forensic-qoe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00620 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00310 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
forensic-qoe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forensic Quality of Earnings
Use deterministic OloLand tools for forensic checks. Do not infer forensic conclusions from prose alone — the verifier-stack premise is that every QoE conclusion comes from a tool with a documented methodology and inputs.
Minimum screen — always run before IC
Each of these is available as an MCP tool / /-command in this plugin:
| Procedure | When required | Tool / command |
|---|---|---|
| Beneish M-Score | Every target. Earnings-manipulation probability. | /cmd-beneish |
| Benford distribution review | Whenever transaction-level GL data is available. Flags fabricated entries. | /cmd-benford |
| EBITDA bridge and adjustment quality | Every target. Walks from reported EBITDA to QoE-adjusted EBITDA with explicit adjustment categories. | /cmd-ebitda-bridge |
| Revenue quality deep dive | Whenever invoice-level or revenue-by-customer detail is available. | manual + tool stack |
| Working capital anomaly review | Every target. DSO/DIO/DPO trends + seasonality. | manual + tool stack |
| Journal entry testing | Whenever transaction-level data is available. Tests journal entries against fraud patterns (round numbers, period-end clustering, manual entries from privileged users). | /cmd-journal-test |
| Lapping detection | Whenever AR aging and cash receipts can be reconciled. | /cmd-lapping-check |
When inputs are missing
State the limitation explicitly. Do not fabricate a conclusion from incomplete data:
- "Benford's review requires transaction-level GL data. The data room contains only summary financials; this procedure was not run."
- "Lapping detection requires AR aging matched with cash receipts. AR aging was provided; cash receipts were not. Procedure deferred."
A QoE that skips a procedure because the data is missing is not a QoE failure — but the IC memo must surface the gap as a diligence condition.
Output format
For each procedure that ran:
- Result — Pass / Yellow / Red
- Evidence basis — what data was used (file, period)
- Methodology note — one sentence on what the procedure tests
- Next-step recommendation if Yellow or Red — what to ask management or what additional data to request
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 46 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 55ce11129207
forensic-qoe is a skill published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 620 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
strategy-pivot-designer
Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
A framework for judging Chinese A-share stocks that have reached the daily price-rise limit, using market mood, sector leadership, and trading momentum.
trading-risk-gate
Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.
vectorbt
High-performance vectorized backtesting with parameter optimization, portfolio simulation, and rich performance metrics.