Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ololand-ai/ololand-plugins --skill saas-diligencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/saas-diligence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/saas-diligence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/saas-diligence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/saas-diligence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/saas-diligence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00557 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
ololand-dd-saas-diligence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SaaS diligence
For SaaS / subscription deals, KPI definitions are load-bearing — wrong ones produce a wrong thesis.
Canonical KPI definitions
| KPI | Definition | Mistake to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| ARR | Annualized contract value of subscription revenue at period end, excluding one-time, services, usage-overage | Counting bookings or TCV as ARR |
| NRR | Period-end ARR from prior-period cohort ÷ prior-period ARR (incl. upsell − churn − contraction) | Forgetting contraction |
| GRR | NRR but excluding upsell — ceiling 100% | Conflating with NRR |
| CAC payback | Fully-loaded S&M ÷ new ARR × gross margin (months) | Excluding marketing or capitalized sales comp |
| Magic number | Net new ARR × 4 ÷ prior-quarter S&M | Using gross new ARR (ignores churn) |
| Rule of 40 | Revenue growth % + EBITDA margin % | Mixing GAAP and adjusted EBITDA |
Verifier checklist
- ARR walk reconciles (opening + new + upsell − contraction − churn = closing)
- NRR cohort methodology disclosed (by dollar/logo, gross/net)
- ASC 606 revenue policy: multi-element split, ratable vs point-in-time, professional services
- Deferred revenue trend aligned with ARR
- Gross margin reconciliation: hosting + CS + 3p SaaS COGS
- Top-10 customer % of ARR
- Free-to-paid conversion trended (if PLG)
- Usage-based revenue volatility separated
Common red flags
- ARR flat with NRR > 110% → implies massive logo churn
- Gross margin > 85% without breakdown of hosting/CS
- CAC payback < 12 months with growth < 30%
- "Committed ARR" or "ARR ex-pilots" (non-standard)
- One-time services in ARR
- Multi-year prepay treated as full-year ARR
Every KPI reported MUST cite source with [N] AND state the methodology used (cohort dollar vs logo, gross vs net). If methodology is not disclosed in source, mark the KPI as "methodology not confirmed."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 42 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 06e12321e2b7
ololand-dd-saas-diligence is a skill published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 557 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sector-rotation
An analysis framework for comparing industries in the Chinese A-share stock market, using business conditions, price momentum, valuation, and money flows. It produces rankings and higher- or lower-allocation suggestions.
strategy-pivot-designer
Detect backtest iteration stagnation and generate structurally different strategy pivot proposals when parameter tuning reaches a local optimum.
twitter-reader
Read Twitter/X for financial research using opencli (read-only). Use this skill whenever the user wants to read their Twitter feed, search for financial tweets, view bookmarks, look up user profiles, or gather market sentiment from Twitter/X. Triggers include: "check my feed", "search Twitter for", "show my…
chenhao-limit-up
A framework for judging Chinese A-share stocks that have reached the daily price-rise limit, using market mood, sector leadership, and trading momentum.
trading-risk-gate
Unified pre-trade safety gate: Ruin check (Law #1), ergodicity audit, and win-rate dominance validation. Absorbs: ergodicity-check, law-of-ruin, win-rate-dominance.
furusato
A Japanese hometown-tax donation manager for furusato nozei, a system where donations to municipalities can qualify for an income-tax or local-tax deduction. It reads donation receipts, stores donation records, and calculates deduction limits.