Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Olshansk/rss-feeds. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Olshansk/rss-feeds/main/.agents/skills/rss-feed-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Olshansk/rss-feedsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/olshansk/rss-feeds/rss-feed-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/olshansk/rss-feeds/rss-feed-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olshansk/rss-feeds/rss-feed-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/olshansk/rss-feeds/rss-feed-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/olshansk/rss-feeds/rss-feed-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00863 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00345 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
cmd-rss-feed-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RSS Feed Review
Review RSS feed generators and their output XML for correctness, robustness, and adherence to project conventions.
Instructions
- Determine scope — review all feed generators by default, or a specific one if the user specifies.
- Read the target generator(s) and their corresponding
feeds/feed_*.xmloutput files. - Read
feed_generators/utils.pyto understand shared helpers. - Evaluate against the checklists below. For every finding, cite
file_path:line_number. - If everything looks good, say so briefly.
Generator Code Review
Selectors & Parsing
- Are CSS selectors specific enough to survive minor site redesigns?
- Are selectors targeting semantic elements (article, h2) over generated class names?
- Is there fallback logic if a selector returns no results?
Error Handling
- Does
fetch_*usetimeout=on requests? - Are HTTP errors handled (
response.raise_for_status()or status check)? - Are Selenium waits using explicit waits (
WebDriverWait) rather thantime.sleep()? - Is the Selenium driver properly closed in a
finallyblock?
Feed Link Setup
Critical convention (from AGENTS.md):
from utils import setup_feed_links
setup_feed_links(fg, blog_url="https://...", feed_name="...")
- The main
<link>must point to the original blog URL, NOT the feed URL rel="self"must be set first,rel="alternate"must be set last- Generators should use the
setup_feed_links()helper fromutils.py - Flag any generator that sets links manually instead of using the helper
Cache Logic (Pagination & Selenium patterns only)
- Is cache loaded before fetching new articles?
- Are articles deduped by URL before saving?
- Is the cache sorted by date descending?
- Does the
--fullflag correctly bypass incremental logic?
Pattern Compliance
- Simple Static: No cache needed, fetches all posts each run
- Pagination + Caching: URL-based pagination with JSON cache in
cache/ - Selenium + Click: Uses
undetected-chromedriver, clicks load-more buttons, caches results - Is the generator using the right pattern for how the target site loads content?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A ec2027022103
cmd-rss-feed-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Olshansk/rss-feeds (726 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 863 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…