Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit --skill test-driven-executiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit/test-driven-execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit/test-driven-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit/test-driven-execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit/test-driven-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit/test-driven-execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01331 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00532 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 170 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Execution Skill
When to Trigger
- At the start of any feature or task from a plan
- When a bug fix is requested (test first, then fix)
- When a subagent is about to implement a module
- When "done" is ambiguous and needs a clear definition
Philosophy
"A feature is not done when code is written. It is done when the tests pass."
Tests written before code serve three purposes:
- They force clarity on what "correct" actually means
- They prevent the agent from drifting into over-engineering
- They provide instant verification that the task is complete
Step-by-Step Process
1. Extract Acceptance Criteria
Read the task description and extract every "must" and "should":
Example task: "Add a user registration endpoint"
Extracted criteria:
- Must accept
email,password,namein request body - Must return 201 on success with the created user (excluding password)
- Must return 400 if email is already registered
- Must return 422 if fields are missing or invalid
- Must hash the password before storing
2. Write the Test Specification
Before writing any implementation, write the tests (or test outlines):
For unit tests:
describe('registerUser()', () => {
it('creates a user with hashed password', async () => { ... })
it('throws DuplicateEmailError if email already exists', async () => { ... })
it('throws ValidationError if email format is invalid', async () => { ... })
it('never stores plaintext password', async () => { ... })
})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 170 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A bffbe70b531f
test-driven-execution is a skill published in the GitHub repository omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit (94 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,331 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd
Use for every coding task. Enforce strict TDD workflow: activate Serena, investigate first, clarify+confirm requirements, write per-task REQUIREMENTS.md in .requirements/ /, verify APIs via web search, then implement in tiny test-verified steps.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
tdd-practitioner
Practice Test-Driven Development with the red-green-refactor cycle. Write tests before code to drive better design, coverage, and confidence.
tdd-full-cycle
Group skill: Test-Driven Development full cycle — plan, RED phase, GREEN phase, REFACTOR phase, E2E tests, coverage, and review.
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug…
deployment-validation-config-validate
Validate application configuration with schemas, environment checks, and runtime tests. Use when preventing configuration errors, checking deployment settings, or detecting configuration drift.