Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ondrasek/cc-plugins/developnpx skills add ondrasek/cc-plugins --skill developgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ondrasek/cc-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01407 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00704 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00281 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
develop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Develop
Bridges issue tracking and development workflow. Creates branches, manages work context.
Critical Rules
- Read cross-cutting behaviors first:
skills/shared/references/cross-cutting.md - Always view the issue first before starting development
- Worktree reuse: If already in a git worktree (e.g.,
claude -w), do NOT create a new branch — rename the current branch to match the issue and continue - Check working tree for uncommitted changes before switching branches
- Add a comment to the issue when starting development
- Self-assign the issue when starting work (if not already assigned)
Prerequisites Check
gh auth status
git status
Capabilities
1. Start Development
Begin work on an issue: view it, create a branch, assign, and comment.
Workflow:
- View the issue for context:
Verify the issue is open. If closed, ask the user if they want to reopen it.gh issue view NUMBER --json number,title,body,labels,assignees,state
1b. Readiness review — delegate to the issue-reviewer agent to verify the issue has acceptance criteria and proper labels before starting development. Present the review results to the user. If the review fails, suggest refining the issue first using the refine skill.
1c. Detect worktree — check if already inside a git worktree:
if [ "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" != "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" ]; then
echo "Inside a worktree"
fi
If in a worktree: skip steps 2-4 entirely. The current branch IS the development branch. Rename it to follow the NUMBER-slug convention if it doesn't already match:
# Only rename if current branch doesn't match NUMBER-* pattern
CURRENT=$(git branch --show-current)
TARGET="NUMBER-slugified-title"
if [ "$CURRENT" != "$TARGET" ]; then
git branch -m "$TARGET"
fi
Then continue directly to step 5.
- Check working tree:
If there are uncommitted changes, warn the user and ask how to proceed (stash, commit, or abort).git status --porcelain
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 167 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 5487561eed98
develop is a skill published in the GitHub repository ondrasek/cc-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,407 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…