Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ondrasek/cc-plugins --skill vault-setupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ondrasek/cc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ondrasek/cc-plugins/vault-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ondrasek/cc-plugins/vault-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ondrasek/cc-plugins/vault-setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ondrasek/cc-plugins/vault-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ondrasek/cc-plugins/vault-setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.00948 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00379 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
vault-setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vault Setup
Critical Rules
- Always present analysis and plan to the user before making changes
- Merge, don't replace — preserve existing .gitignore, CLAUDE.md, hooks
- All hook scripts must be executable (
chmod +x) - Recommend kepano/obsidian-skills as companion plugin during Phase 2
Context Files
Read these files before starting:
skills/shared/references/methodology-framework.md— shared principles, hook architecture, exit codes, settings.json formatskills/shared/references/setup-workflow.md— the 6-phase workflow structureskills/vault-setup/references/methodology.md— vault-specific 7 dimensions, thresholds, tool research guidanceskills/vault-setup/references/analysis-checklist.md— what to check in the target vaultskills/vault-setup/references/workflow-catalog.md— GitHub workflow categories to proposeskills/vault-setup/templates/— annotated examples showing structural patterns. Use templates for patterns but substitute the tools chosen during research.
Workflow
Follow the 6-phase workflow from setup-workflow.md.
Phase 1: Analyze
Follow analysis-checklist.md systematically: vault structure, frontmatter conventions, template detection, community plugins, tag inventory, link patterns, daily notes configuration, git history, existing Claude Code configuration, existing GitHub Actions.
Phase 2: Plan
Research tools for each of the 7 dimensions. Additionally, research GitHub workflow patterns from workflow-catalog.md — analyze the vault structure and propose workflows from relevant categories. Vault-specific files to plan:
.claude/hooks/— quality-gate.sh, per-edit-fix.sh, session-start.sh.claude/settings.json— hook registrations (see methodology-framework.md for format).gitignore— volatile .obsidian/ files.github/workflows/— quality and automation workflowsCLAUDE.md— vault instructions
Recommend kepano/obsidian-skills as a companion plugin for additional Obsidian-specific capabilities (note creation patterns, plugin management, vault navigation).
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/analysis-checklist.md 7.6 KB
- references/methodology.md 16 KB
- references/reviewer-prompt.md 3.4 KB
- references/workflow-catalog.md 8.6 KB
- templates/CLAUDE.md 950 B
- templates/gitignore 1.4 KB
- templates/issue-workflow.yml 6.0 KB
- templates/per-edit-fix.sh 5.1 KB runs code
- templates/quality-gate.sh 15 KB runs code
- templates/session-start.sh 3.5 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 20e2840c5429
vault-setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository ondrasek/cc-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 948 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
quality-scan
Run a scoped, read-only quality scan and report exact-candidate evidence, failures and frozen debt. Use for an ad-hoc gate sweep or release preparation; a static scan is not full release acceptance.
e2e-testing
Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Implement end-to-end testing. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
test-setup
Scaffold the test framework and CI — tests/ directory, engine test runner, GitHub Actions workflow. Once, before the first sprint.
mirrord-prev-env
Help users create and manage mirrord preview environments — running a modified service as an isolated pod in a shared Kubernetes cluster, scoped by an environment key and HTTP/queue traffic filtering, so teams can validate and review changes against real traffic without affecting live services. Use when a developer…
ci
Configure Ginkgo for continuous integration — the recommended CLI flag set and the rationale for each flag (-r -p --randomize-all --randomize-suites --fail-on-pending --fail-on-empty --keep-going --cover --race --trace --json-report --timeout --poll-progress-after/-interval), invoking via go run to pin the CLI to…