Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Onevium/awesome-claude-skills --skill wireframegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Onevium/awesome-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/onevium/awesome-claude-skills/wireframe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onevium/awesome-claude-skills/wireframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onevium/awesome-claude-skills/wireframe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onevium/awesome-claude-skills/wireframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onevium/awesome-claude-skills/wireframe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00721 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
wireframe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
制作低保真线框图
线框图的价值是用低成本探索结构，而不是展示最终视觉。默认提供 3 个方向；用户指定数量或只需要一个流程时尊重其要求。
1. 明确探索目标
确认对象、用户目标、设备、既有约束、不可缺少内容、方案数量和主要变化轴，例如布局、密度、步骤、导航或 CTA 位置。需求过于开放时先给出 2–3 个可选探索轴。
2. 统一低保真语言
- 只用黑、白和少量灰阶，不引入品牌色。
- 使用系统无衬线字体，不让用户过早讨论字体个性。
- 内容区用带标签的方框表示，图像使用条纹或明确尺寸占位符。
- 文案只保留结构所需长度，不假装已经完成最终内容。
- 可以使用矩形、线条和简单图标等低保真 SVG，但所有元素应保持同一抽象层级。
3. 制作有实质差异的方案
各方案应在布局、信息密度、流程结构、CTA、导航或交互模型上不同。先写明每版的核心假设，再绘制，避免三版收敛成近似布局。
单屏方案放在一个并排画布中；流程方案用每版 3–5 屏的 storyboard。通常从稳妥到大胆排序。
4. 就地标注取舍
每版旁边放 2–4 条短注释，说明优势、代价和需要验证的问题。注释与图同处一个文件，不另建难以对应的说明文档。
5. 捕获决定
用户选择后记录采用的方向或混合方案、喜欢与拒绝的具体原因，以及新出现的约束。将这些决定作为高保真或原型阶段的简报，不在线框图上继续做无意义视觉抛光。
示例
输入：“先给结账页画三个线框方向。”
**输出：**在一个灰阶画布中展示单栏线性、双栏固定订单摘要和折叠式分步流程三版，每版附带 2–4 条取舍说明，并建议选定方向后再制作交互原型。
来源与许可
本 Skill 基于 Trystan Sarrade 的 claude-design-system-prompt 进行中文化与 Claude Skill 规范适配。上游与本改编均按 MIT License 发布，详见 LICENSE.txt。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 7108da63f8fb
wireframe is a skill published in the GitHub repository Onevium/awesome-claude-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 721 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-product
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production.
anti-slop-design
Autonomous Principal Design Technologist. Cures vibe-coded software from AI frontend slop using curated token archetypes and 7-axis quality gating.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
accesslint-audit
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.
anti-ui-slop
Stop coding agents from shipping generic UI. Extend the product's design system, use UIZZE evidence only when useful, cover required states, and inspect the rendered result.
accesslint-scan
Audit a live page for accessibility issues, locate each WCAG violation precisely, and return a selector-grounded fix worklist without editing.