Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library --skill ai-dpiagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/ai-dpia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/ai-dpia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/ai-dpia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/ai-dpia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/ai-dpia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.02775 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01388 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00555 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
ai-dpia scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ai-dpia — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Protection Impact Assessment for AI/ML Systems
Overview
AI and ML systems present unique privacy challenges that traditional DPIA methodologies fail to adequately address. The EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on processing personal data through AI systems establish a specialized framework that supplements the general DPIA requirements of GDPR Article 35 and WP248rev.01. AI-specific DPIAs must evaluate the entire ML pipeline — from training data collection through model deployment and inference — assessing risks that emerge from statistical learning, emergent model behaviours, and the opacity of algorithmic decision-making. This skill implements the EDPB's AI-specific DPIA methodology integrated with the EU AI Act risk classification framework.
AI-Specific DPIA Triggers
Mandatory DPIA Triggers for AI Systems
All AI processing that meets any of the following criteria requires a DPIA before deployment:
| Trigger | Legal Basis | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AI-based profiling with legal effects | Art. 35(3)(a) GDPR | ML models that produce decisions with legal or similarly significant effects on natural persons (credit scoring, hiring, insurance pricing) |
| Training on special category data | Art. 35(3)(b) GDPR | Models trained on health, biometric, genetic, racial, political, religious, sexual orientation, or trade union data at scale |
| AI-powered surveillance | Art. 35(3)(c) GDPR | Computer vision, facial recognition, behavioural analytics, or anomaly detection in public spaces |
| High-risk AI systems | Art. 6 EU AI Act | Systems listed in Annex III of the AI Act (biometric identification, critical infrastructure, employment, law enforcement, migration, justice) |
| Foundation models processing personal data | EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 | LLMs and foundation models trained on datasets containing personal data, regardless of downstream use |
| Automated inference of sensitive attributes | EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 | Models that infer Art. 9 special category data from non-sensitive inputs (inferring health status from purchasing patterns) |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 203 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 050ed99607b8
ai-dpia is a skill published in the GitHub repository onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library (16 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 2,775 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ai-dpia, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
atmos-aws-compliance
AWS compliance commands in Atmos: atmos aws compliance report, Security Hub standards, CIS AWS, PCI DSS, SOC2, HIPAA, NIST, report formats, AI summaries.
security-compliance
Guides security professionals in implementing defense-in-depth security architectures, achieving compliance with industry frameworks (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, HIPAA), conducting threat modeling and risk assessments, managing security operations and incident response, and embedding security throughout the SDLC.
ai-policy-generator
AI governance policy creation for nonprofits and enterprises with frameworks, risk assessment, ethical guidelines, and compliance templates. Use when drafting AI usage policies, responsible AI frameworks, or organizational AI governance documents.
compliance-engineering
SOC2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, FedRAMP compliance implementation in code. Audit logging, data encryption, access controls, privacy by design, and regulatory requirement mapping. Use when implementing compliance controls, preparing for audits, or building privacy-compliant systems.
jk
Manage Jenkins controllers with jk, including jobs, runs, logs, artifacts, credentials, nodes, queues, and plugins.
harness-init-runner
Initialize a lightweight repo-local Node.js harness (harness/ + .harness/) WITHOUT AIOS dependency. Use ONLY when you need a standalone, portable harness. If AIOS is installed, use aios-long-running-harness instead — it has rex Command hosting, ContextDB integration, and checkpoint recovery.