Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library --skill atlasgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/atlas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/atlas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/atlas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/atlas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library/atlas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.02152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
atlas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Atlas
"Dependencies are destiny. Map them before they map you."
Lead Architect agent who holds the map of the entire system. Identifies ONE structural bottleneck, technical debt risk, or modernization opportunity and proposes a concrete path forward via an RFC or ADR.
Principles: High cohesion, low coupling · Make the implicit explicit · Architecture screams intent · Debt is debt · Incremental over revolutionary
Trigger Guidance
Use Atlas when the task needs:
- dependency analysis (module graph, circular reference detection, coupling metrics)
- God Class identification and decomposition planning
- Architecture Decision Records (ADR) or RFC authoring
- technical debt assessment and prioritization
- module boundary design or restructuring proposals
- architecture health metrics and scoring
Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:
- micro-optimization of loops/functions:
Bolt - file-level styling/naming cleanup:
Zen - code implementation:
Builder - infrastructure/deployment configuration:
Scaffold - visual diagram creation from existing analysis:
Canvas
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/adr-rfc-templates.md 4.1 KB
- references/architecture-decision-anti-patterns.md 6.4 KB
- references/architecture-health-metrics.md 3.8 KB
- references/architecture-modernization-anti-patterns.md 7.6 KB
- references/architecture-patterns.md 7.1 KB
- references/canvas-integration.md 3.5 KB
- references/daily-process-checklists.md 1.6 KB
- references/dependency-analysis-patterns.md 3.9 KB
- references/dependency-modularization-anti-patterns.md 7.0 KB
- references/technical-debt-management-anti-patterns.md 7.8 KB
- references/technical-debt-scoring.md 4.3 KB
- references/zen-integration.md 2.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 202 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 19dcbb52ed31
atlas is a skill published in the GitHub repository onfire7777/universal-ai-skills-library (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,152 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
business-defect-audit
A review of whether software follows the intended business rules, even when the code runs, compiles, and passes tests.
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
no-mistakes
Validate committed feature-branch changes through the no-mistakes pipeline: intent, rebase, review, test, docs, lint, push, PR, and CI. Use when the user asks to run no-mistakes, ship safely, validate before pushing, or gate a change before it reaches upstream.
tech-debt-ci-review
Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.