Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ooiyeefei/ccc --skill rethink-surveysgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ooiyeefei/cccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ooiyeefei/ccc/rethink-surveys)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ooiyeefei/ccc/rethink-surveys"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ooiyeefei/ccc/rethink-surveys/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ooiyeefei/ccc/rethink-surveys"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ooiyeefei/ccc/rethink-surveys.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00175 | $0.03132 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00088 | $0.01566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00626 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00313 |
Grade A, and why
rethink-surveys scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rethink Surveys
A survey is a conversation with a busy person. Design it like one.
This skill packages a framework for designing, critiquing, and operationalizing surveys that capture real intent — not satisficed checkbox approval. Built from the experience of designing the Proxymate muShanghai survey (which surfaced bugs in ~6 hours of testing that a category-checkbox flow would have hidden for weeks).
Tool affordances (read first)
The bundled rethink-survey-mcp-server exposes the skill's deterministic operations as MCP tools, its canonical content as MCP resources, and three framing prompts as slash-prompts. When available, prefer them over reasoning from memory.
- Use MCP tools when the user wants a specific deterministic result:
critique_surveyfor lint,get_templatefor a use-case starter,design_survey_sessionfor the staged wizard,score_responsefor a single response,cluster_responsesfor a batch. - Reason from skill content when the user wants to understand: debate a principle, discuss trade-offs, explain why hypotheticals fail, or do anything not exposed as a tool (e.g.
/turn-into-appcodegen). - Fetch resources for grounding instead of paraphrasing:
rethink://principles,rethink://principles/{id},rethink://structure/4-part,rethink://question-library/{part},rethink://use-case/{event|founder|gig},rethink://scoring/rubrics,rethink://modality/decision-tree,rethink://anti-patterns. - Slash-prompts the user may invoke:
/jarrett-review(Caroline Jarrett-style review),/design-coaching(Socratic design questions),/mom-test-check(Rob Fitzpatrick founder-discovery lint).
If the MCP server isn't connected, all of the below still works from this skill's reference files. For details on tool inputs/outputs, fallback rules, and prompt framing, read references/mcp-integration.md.
Three operating modes (commands)
/design-survey— interactive design session: research goal → audience → hypotheses → questions → modality → output schema. Walks the user through 5–8 decisions, each with explicit trade-offs. Reuses templates where appropriate./critique-survey— paste-in review: identify leading questions, double-barreled items, satisficing bait, missing behavioral anchors, demographic-for-demographic noise. Returns a Jarrett-style critique with concrete rewrites./turn-into-app— implementation handoff: takes a finalized question set and produces app scaffold (TanStack Start / Next.js / pure HTML, plus Supabase or simple JSON storage). User picks the stack; this command emits the code.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 168 lines · 175 tokens per session scan A c2548d4705c1
rethink-surveys is a skill published in the GitHub repository ooiyeefei/ccc (487 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 175 tokens to every session and 3,132 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…