Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/openai/openai-agents-python/examples-run-analysisnpx skills add openai/openai-agents-python --skill examples-run-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openai/openai-agents-pythonWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00891 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00445 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
examples-run-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Examples Run Analysis
Use this skill only to analyze artifacts that already exist after a user has manually invoked an examples Make target. This skill is read-only and analysis-only.
Hard boundary
- Never start, retry, stop, or otherwise execute examples.
- Never invoke an examples Make target or
.github/scripts/run_examples.sh. - Never request elevated execution, alter an environment, remove a pid file, or own or signal a background process.
- Never treat an older completed run as current when the newest run is active, incomplete, or stale.
- If usable results are missing, stale, incomplete, or still running, stop the analysis and ask the user to run the appropriate Make target manually. Give the exact command but do not execute it.
The supported workflow is an explicit manual Make invocation followed by analysis of the generated artifacts.
Artifacts to inspect
- Background pid file:
.tmp/examples-auto-run.pid. - Main logs:
.tmp/examples-start-logs/main_*.log. - Per-example logs named by each
log=field in the selected main log. - Example sources named by
PASSED,FAILED, andSKIPPEDrecords. - Runner sources that define artifact meaning:
examples/run_examples.py,.github/scripts/run_examples.sh, and the example source files included in the run.
Use only read-only inspection commands such as git status, git log, find, ls, stat, ps, sed, and rg. Do not call a command that can update an artifact or process.
Analysis workflow
- Inspect the process table and
.tmp/examples-auto-run.pidwithout changing either. Treat a process as an active examples run only when its command line is rooted in the current repository and invokes.github/scripts/run_examples.shorexamples/run_examples.py, including foreground and background runs. Use the pid file only to correlate a background process; an absent or stale pid file does not prove that no run is active. If a matching process is live, stop the analysis. Tell the user to wait for a foreground Make run to finish, or ask the user to runmake examples-statusmanually for a background run, before requesting analysis again. - Select the newest
main_*.log. Require exactly one terminal# summary executed=<n> skipped=<n> failed=<n>record. Treat a missing or malformed summary, a changing log, or a matching active examples process as incomplete. - Treat the result as stale when relevant runner or selected example source content changed after the run. Use Git history and file timestamps as evidence. If freshness cannot be established, say so and request a new manual run instead of assuming the artifacts apply.
- Parse every
PASSED,FAILED, andSKIPPEDrecord. Reconcile their counts with the terminal summary. Confirm that every referenced per-example log exists. - For every
PASSEDrecord, without sampling, read the complete example source and its per-example log. Infer the intended flow, tools, side effects, and key result from the source and comments, then verify that the log demonstrates those behaviors. Exit status 0 alone is not behavioral validation. - Read the relevant per-example logs for failures and environment-related skips. Classify each result as an example or SDK defect, dependency or credential problem, provider or network failure, local service or platform restriction, intentional runner skip, or unresolved. Keep genuine product failures separate from environment restrictions.
- Report the selected main log, freshness and completeness evidence, summary counts, validation status for every exit-0 example, classified failures and skips, and exact source/log line references that support each conclusion.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 52 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 10c31597127a
examples-run-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository openai/openai-agents-python (29,075 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 891 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
stripe-projects
Use after E2B sandbox/API access has been provisioned through Stripe Projects and the user needs to use the resulting E2B API key with the E2B CLI, JavaScript SDK, Python SDK, or Code Interpreter SDK.
code-review
Code review assistance with linting, style checking, and best practices.
haiku
When writing a haiku for this bot, follow these conventions.
cli-e2e
Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.
cross-sdk-parity
Keep TypeScript and Python SDK behavior, generated client usage, public API naming, and docs examples aligned. Use when a change affects both SDKs, when generated client pins move, when comparing TS/Python behavior, or when a backend API contract changed. Do not use for single-language internal-only changes.
python-release
Handle Python SDK release, build, bump, packaging metadata, PyPI client pin, uv.lock, nox/build workflow, and publish verification changes. Use for Python release process work or dependency pin bumps; do not use for ordinary Python feature implementation.