OpenAkita is an open-source framework for building an AI assistant made of multiple collaborating agents, plugins, tools, and sandboxed workflows. It is used to automate tasks such as web searches, computer operation, file management, scheduled jobs, and messaging across supported chat platforms. The catalogue entries are skills, rules, agents, and instructions that define or extend its workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add openakita/openakita --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openakita/openakitaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openakita/openakita/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openakita/openakita/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openakita/openakita/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openakita/openakita/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openakita/openakita/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00762 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
openakita/skills@code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 68 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A bcfd54f3551d
openakita/skills@code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository openakita/openakita (1,980 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 762 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Reviews code diffs and files for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), error handling, complexity, naming conventions, and performance issues. Use when the user asks to review a PR, pull request, diff, merge request, or code changes.
a0-review-plugin
Full audit of Agent Zero plugins in usr/plugins/. Reviews manifest validity, directory structure, code patterns (Store Gating, notifications, imports), security, and duplicate detection against the community index. Use when asked to review, audit, validate, or check an existing plugin before using or contributing it.
nlpm-audit
Audit SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, prompts, hooks, and plugin manifests for instruction conflicts, quality, broken references, and manifest-to-disk drift.
gh-address-comments
Use when addressing GitHub PR review comments or issue comments on the current branch with gh CLI, including auth checks, comment triage, edits, verification, and replies.
autonomous
Use when five specialized autonomous agents (code, deploy, planning, research, review) working as a coordinated pipeline. From spec to shipped code with automated planning, research, review, and deployment gates. Use when working with autonomous agents.
coding
Use when five specialized coding agents (linter, perf, refactor, security, test) that enforce quality gates across the development lifecycle. From lint enforcement through performance profiling, refactoring, security auditing, and test coverage. Use when working with coding agents.