Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add openkursar/hello-halo --skill code-review-onegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openkursar/hello-haloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openkursar/hello-halo/code-review-one)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openkursar/hello-halo/code-review-one"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openkursar/hello-halo/code-review-one/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openkursar/hello-halo/code-review-one"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openkursar/hello-halo/code-review-one.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00240 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-one scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 10 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 753b688c0d3b
code-review-one is a skill published in the GitHub repository openkursar/hello-halo (1,740 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 240 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-18.
Other skills, from other repositories
ss-review
Wrap up a finished change — self-review the diff, run the full test/lint gate, verify against acceptance criteria, update docs, then prepare commit/PR. Use after coding is done, when asked to "review my changes", "wrap up", "finalize", or "is this ready to merge". Final stage of the specship pipeline.
ss-ship
Take a feature request from idea to reviewed, ready-to-commit code in one run — spec → plan → coding → review (+ debug on defects) — without asking at each stage. Use when given a request like "/ss-ship implement login", "ship this feature", "do the whole flow for X", "làm hết flow cho chức năng X". Orchestrator over…
open-code-review
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the ocr CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply…
baby-sit
Monitor a GitHub pull request until CI is green, diagnose failures, and rerun only evidence-backed flaky GitHub Actions jobs.
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.
review
Comprehensive security and correctness audit. Use for review, deep review, thermo nuclear, or thermonuclear requests and branch or PR diff audits.