codebase-impact-analysis

codebase-impact-analysis is a skill for Claude Code from openshift-eng/ai-helpers. It costs 30 tokens per session (1,778 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A Go code analysis workflow that determines whether a project is affected by a specific CVE and assigns a risk level based on collected evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect Go module dependencies, compare vulnerable versions, trace relevant functions, and support a security impact decision.
Why use it?
A vulnerable dependency is not always reachable or exploitable in a particular application; this analysis checks the project's actual use of it.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the compliance plugin — 4 skills, 1 command shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect Go module dependencies, compare vulnerable versions, trace relevant…

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/codebase-impact-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add openshift-eng/ai-helpers --skill codebase-impact-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-eng/ai-helpers

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install compliance, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 1 command.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for codebase-impact-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/codebase-impact-analysis.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/codebase-impact-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/codebase-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/codebase-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,778 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.01778
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00889
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00356
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00178

Measured 3d ago against content hash b27f57edf8b9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codebase-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

plugins/compliance/skills/codebase-impact-analysis/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Codebase Impact Analysis

Determines whether a Go codebase is impacted by a specific CVE by applying multiple analysis methods with increasing confidence, collecting evidence, and assigning a risk level.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • A CVE profile has been gathered (from the cve-intelligence-gathering skill)
  • You need to determine if the current Go project is affected
  • You need to assign a risk level with supporting evidence

Prerequisites

Required Tools (validated in Phase 0 of parent command)

  • go toolchain with go.mod in workspace root
  • govulncheck: go install golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck@latest
  • callgraph: go install golang.org/x/tools/cmd/callgraph@latest
  • digraph: go install golang.org/x/tools/cmd/digraph@latest

Required Inputs

From Phase 1 (cve-intelligence-gathering skill):

  • CVE ID
  • Affected package/module name(s)
  • Vulnerable version range
  • Fixed version (if available)
  • Vulnerable function signatures (if known)

From Parent Command:

  • --algo preference for call graph analysis (default: vta)

Implementation Steps

Step 1: Identify Go Module Dependencies

# Parse dependencies from go.mod
go list -m all

# Get detailed dependency info
go list -m -json all
  • Read go.mod from workspace root
  • Parse direct and indirect dependencies
  • Extract module versions

Step 2: Cross-Reference Vulnerable Packages

Apply the following methods in order. Each provides increasing confidence.

Method 1: Dependency Matching
  • Compare CVE-affected packages with go.mod dependencies
  • Check if affected package versions are in use
  • Account for version ranges and semantic versioning
# Check if vulnerable package is a dependency
go list -m <vulnerable-package>

Decision Point:

  • IF package NOT in dependencies → Skip to risk assignment (likely LOW RISK)
  • IF package found → Continue to Method 2
Method 2: Go Vulnerability Scanner
# Run official Go vulnerability scanner
govulncheck ./...

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 221 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A b27f57edf8b9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codebase-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository openshift-eng/ai-helpers (116 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,778 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

golang-testing

Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.

affaan-m/ECC · 37 tokens

golang-patterns

Go-specific design patterns and best practices including functional options, small interfaces, dependency injection, concurrency patterns, error handling, and package organization. Use when working with Go code to apply idiomatic Go patterns.

affaan-m/ECC · 45 tokens

ast-grep

Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should be used when users ask to search for…

JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh · 80 tokens

golang-testing

Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…

samber/cc-skills-golang · 115 tokens

golang-samber-oops

Structured error handling in Golang with samber/oops — error builders, stack traces, error codes, error context, error wrapping, error attributes, user-facing vs developer messages, panic recovery, and logger integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/oops, or when the codebase already imports…

samber/cc-skills-golang · 74 tokens

golang-uber-fx

Golang application framework using uber-go/fx — fx.New, fx.Provide, fx.Invoke, fx.Module, fx.Lifecycle hooks, fx.Annotate (name/group/As), fx.Decorate, fx.Supply, fx.Replace, fx.WithLogger, and signal-aware Run(). Apply when using or adopting uber-go/fx, when the codebase imports go.uber.org/fx, or when wiring…

samber/cc-skills-golang · 122 tokens