Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add openshift-eng/ai-helpers --skill git-commit-formatgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-eng/ai-helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/git-commit-format)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/git-commit-format"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/git-commit-format/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/git-commit-format"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/git-commit-format.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00888 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00355 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00178 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
git-commit-format scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Name
openshift-developer:git-commit-format
Synopsis
/openshift-developer:git-commit-format
Description
Applies conventional commit formatting rules when generating commit messages. This skill is loaded as context for other skills and workflows — it defines the commit message format, required footers, and validation rules.
Implementation
Commit Message Format
<type>(<scope>): <description>
[optional body]
[footers]
Commit Types
- feat: New features
- fix: Bug fixes
- docs: Documentation changes
- style: Code style changes (formatting, etc.)
- refactor: Code refactoring (no functional changes)
- test: Adding/updating tests
- chore: Maintenance tasks
- build: Build system or dependency changes
- ci: CI/CD changes
- perf: Performance improvements
- revert: Revert previous commit
Breaking Changes
With ! to draw attention:
feat!: send email when product shipped
With BREAKING CHANGE footer:
feat: allow config to extend other configs
BREAKING CHANGE: `extends` key now used for extending config files
Required Footers
Signed-off-by
ALWAYS include Signed-off-by footer with name and email.
Get credentials in this priority order:
- Environment variables:
$GIT_AUTHOR_NAMEand$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL - Git config:
git config user.nameandgit config user.email - If neither configured, ask user to provide details
Commit-Message-Assisted-by
ALWAYS include when Claude assists with creating or generating the commit message:
Commit-Message-Assisted-by: Claude (via Claude Code)
Gitlint Validation Rules
- Run
make run-gitlintto validate commit messages (if the repo has a gitlint target) - Title line: 120 characters maximum
- Body line: 140 characters maximum per line
- Use conventional commit format
- Include required footers (Signed-off-by)
- No trailing whitespace
Return Value
- Commit message: A conventional commit message with type, scope, description, body, and all required footers
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 26efbfbb9f67
git-commit-format is a skill published in the GitHub repository openshift-eng/ai-helpers (121 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 888 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.