suggest-reviewers

suggest-reviewers is a skill for Claude Code from openshift-eng/ai-helpers. It costs 14 tokens per session (2,536 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A helper for the reviewer-suggestion command that uses Git history to find who authored the lines changed in a pull request. Git blame is a history view that links each line to its previous author.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it inside the reviewer-suggestion workflow to analyse committed or uncommitted changes and aggregate likely human contributors.
Why use it?
It avoids manually tracing changed lines and automatically filters out bot accounts.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the git plugin — 2 skills, 10 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it inside the reviewer-suggestion workflow to analyse committed or uncommitted changes and aggregate likely human contributors.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add openshift-eng/ai-helpers
Claude Code
/plugin install git

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install git, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills, 10 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for suggest-reviewers

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/suggest-reviewers/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/suggest-reviewers)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/suggest-reviewers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/suggest-reviewers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for suggest-reviewers

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/suggest-reviewers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/suggest-reviewers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,536 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.02536
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.01268
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00507
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00254

Measured 8d ago against content hash cf81094c8df5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

suggest-reviewers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (analyze_blame.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

plugins/git/skills/suggest-reviewers/SKILL.md · 348 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 348 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Suggest Reviewers Helper

This skill provides a Python helper script that analyzes git blame data for the /git:suggest-reviewers command. The script handles the complex task of identifying which lines were changed and who authored the original code.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when implementing the /git:suggest-reviewers command. The helper script should be invoked during Step 3 of the command implementation (analyzing git blame for changed lines).

DO NOT implement git blame analysis manually - always use the provided analyze_blame.py script.

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.6 or higher
  • Git repository with commit history
  • Git CLI available in PATH

Helper Script: analyze_blame.py

The analyze_blame.py script automates the complex process of:

  1. Parsing git diff output to identify specific line ranges that were modified
  2. Running git blame on only the changed line ranges (not entire files)
  3. Extracting and aggregating author information with statistics
  4. Filtering out bot accounts automatically

Usage

For uncommitted changes:

python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/suggest-reviewers/analyze_blame.py \
  --mode uncommitted \
  --file path/to/file1.go \
  --file path/to/file2.py \
  --output json

For committed changes on a feature branch:

python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/suggest-reviewers/analyze_blame.py \
  --mode committed \
  --base-branch main \
  --file path/to/file1.go \
  --file path/to/file2.py \
  --output json

Parameters

  • --mode: Required. Either uncommitted or committed

    • uncommitted: Analyzes unstaged/staged changes against HEAD
    • committed: Analyzes committed changes against a base branch
  • --base-branch: Required when mode is committed. The base branch to compare against (e.g., main, master)

  • --file: Can be specified multiple times. Each file to analyze for blame information. Only changed files should be passed.

  • --output: Output format. Default is json. Options:

    • json: Machine-readable JSON output
    • text: Human-readable text output

Read the full file on GitHub · 348 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 348 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A cf81094c8df5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

suggest-reviewers is a skill published in the GitHub repository openshift-eng/ai-helpers (116 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 2,536 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

prowler-commit

Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.

prowler-cloud/prowler · 33 tokens

gh-auth-isolation

Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows.

github/gh-aw · 20 tokens

comet-github

A routing guide for Comet-related GitHub work. It directs requests about pull requests, issues, CI failures, ideas, and fixes to the appropriate review or implementation process.

rpamis/comet · 72 tokens

github-skill

Work with GitHub via the gh CLI — clone repositories, create/list/merge pull requests, create/list issues, and run any other gh command (API calls, workflow runs, releases, repo administration). List operations return parsed JSON.

zeenie-ai/OpenCompany · 51 tokens

changelog-composer

Generates structured changelogs and release notes from git history and PRs, classifying breaking changes, features, fixes, performance, docs. Triggers on: "generate changelog", "write release notes", "what changed since", "prepare release", "release notes for", "diff since tag".

Mathews-Tom/armory · 67 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens