openstatusHQ/data-table-filters is a React toolkit for building data tables with filters, sorting, scrolling, and reusable table components. It helps developers create filterable tables using shadcn/ui and TanStack Table. The catalogue add-ons provide table blocks, state adapters, cell renderers, query integration, and other parts of its workflow.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to openstatusHQ/data-table-filters. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstatusHQ/data-table-filters/main/.agents/skills/web-design-guidelines/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openstatusHQ/data-table-filtersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openstatushq/data-table-filters/web-design-guidelines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openstatushq/data-table-filters/web-design-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openstatushq/data-table-filters/web-design-guidelines/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openstatushq/data-table-filters/web-design-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openstatushq/data-table-filters/web-design-guidelines.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
web-design-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to web-design-guidelines — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Web Interface Guidelines
Review files for compliance with Web Interface Guidelines.
How It Works
- Fetch the latest guidelines from the source URL below
- Read the specified files (or prompt user for files/pattern)
- Check against all rules in the fetched guidelines
- Output findings in the terse
file:lineformat
Guidelines Source
Fetch fresh guidelines before each review:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vercel-labs/web-interface-guidelines/main/command.md
Use WebFetch to retrieve the latest rules. The fetched content contains all the rules and output format instructions.
Usage
When a user provides a file or pattern argument:
- Fetch guidelines from the source URL above
- Read the specified files
- Apply all rules from the fetched guidelines
- Output findings using the format specified in the guidelines
If no files specified, ask the user which files to review.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 65d7dbaf180a
web-design-guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository openstatusHQ/data-table-filters (2,282 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to web-design-guidelines, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
web-design-guidelines
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
shadcn
Manages shadcn components and projects — adding, searching, fixing, debugging, styling, and composing UI, including chat interfaces. Provides project context, component docs, and usage examples. Applies when working with shadcn/ui, component registries, presets, --preset codes, or any project with a components.json…
compiler-review
Review Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares against the original TypeScript source.
magic-ui
Use this skill when users want to add, customize, or troubleshoot Magic UI components in React/Next.js projects. It covers component selection, shadcn registry installation (@magicui/), integration patterns, and practical quality checks for accessibility and maintainability.
ss-learn
Capture a human-approved UI design lesson as a privacy-minimized local StyleSeed candidate, review it, and prepare an opt-in share package without transmitting project code, prompts, screenshots, or brand data. Use when a person asks StyleSeed to remember, learn from, generalize, review, or prepare a reusable rule…
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.