Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add openteams-lab/openteams --skill better-proposals-automationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openteams-lab/openteamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/better-proposals-automation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/better-proposals-automation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/better-proposals-automation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/better-proposals-automation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/better-proposals-automation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
better-proposals-automation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to ably-automation — 24 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Better Proposals Automation via Rube MCP
Automate Better Proposals operations through Composio's Better Proposals toolkit via Rube MCP.
Toolkit docs: composio.dev/toolkits/better_proposals
Prerequisites
- Rube MCP must be connected (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS available)
- Active Better Proposals connection via
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSwith toolkitbetter_proposals - Always call
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLSfirst to get current tool schemas
Setup
Get Rube MCP: Add https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.
- Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLSresponds - Call
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSwith toolkitbetter_proposals - If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete setup
- Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows
Tool Discovery
Always discover available tools before executing workflows:
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
queries: [{use_case: "Better Proposals operations", known_fields: ""}]
session: {generate_id: true}
This returns available tool slugs, input schemas, recommended execution plans, and known pitfalls.
Core Workflow Pattern
Step 1: Discover Available Tools
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
queries: [{use_case: "your specific Better Proposals task"}]
session: {id: "existing_session_id"}
Step 2: Check Connection
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS
toolkits: ["better_proposals"]
session_id: "your_session_id"
Step 3: Execute Tools
RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL
tools: [{
tool_slug: "TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH",
arguments: {/* schema-compliant args from search results */}
}]
memory: {}
session_id: "your_session_id"
Known Pitfalls
- Always search first: Tool schemas change. Never hardcode tool slugs or arguments without calling
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS - Check connection: Verify
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSshows ACTIVE status before executing tools - Schema compliance: Use exact field names and types from the search results
- Memory parameter: Always include
memoryinRUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOLcalls, even if empty ({}) - Session reuse: Reuse session IDs within a workflow. Generate new ones for new workflows
- Pagination: Check responses for pagination tokens and continue fetching until complete
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 92 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 1a41cdb0ddcb
better-proposals-automation is a skill published in the GitHub repository openteams-lab/openteams (612 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to ably-automation, differing in 24 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
Notion
Search, read, create, and manage Notion pages and databases.
ai-csv-excel-merger
A tool for combining CSV and Excel materials into one organized result while identifying conflicting fields.
ai-gws-docs
A business-diagnosis assistant for turning document-related input into a summary, conclusions, recommended actions, and reusable deliverables.
potpie-source-ingestion
Use when the user explicitly asks to ingest, refresh, or deeply understand a repository, PR, issue, ticket, runbook, incident report, document, or web link into Potpie. The harness performs todo-driven discovery, uses local/GitHub/integration tools and read-only subagents when available, builds evidence-backed…
computer-use
Read and drive native desktop applications through the accessibility layer — list on-screen apps, snapshot one window as a numbered element tree, then click / type / set a value / scroll / drag / run a named action, by element index or by screen coordinates. Use for work in a desktop app rather than a web page. Full…
papyrus-latex-suggestions
Propose actual inline replacement text (old → new) as accept/reject suggestions — LaTeX "suggesting mode" / track changes — that render directly in the PDF. Use when the author wants concrete edit proposals they can see and accept or reject. For remarks ABOUT the text (notes, not replacements), use…