Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add openteams-lab/openteams --skill browser-tool-automationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openteams-lab/openteamsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/browser-tool-automation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/browser-tool-automation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/browser-tool-automation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/browser-tool-automation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/openteams-lab/openteams/browser-tool-automation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00728 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00364 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
browser-tool-automation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to ably-automation — 24 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Browser Tool Automation via Rube MCP
Automate Browser Tool operations through Composio's Browser Tool toolkit via Rube MCP.
Toolkit docs: composio.dev/toolkits/browser_tool
Prerequisites
- Rube MCP must be connected (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS available)
- Active Browser Tool connection via
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSwith toolkitbrowser_tool - Always call
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLSfirst to get current tool schemas
Setup
Get Rube MCP: Add https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.
- Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLSresponds - Call
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSwith toolkitbrowser_tool - If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete setup
- Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows
Tool Discovery
Always discover available tools before executing workflows:
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
queries: [{use_case: "Browser Tool operations", known_fields: ""}]
session: {generate_id: true}
This returns available tool slugs, input schemas, recommended execution plans, and known pitfalls.
Core Workflow Pattern
Step 1: Discover Available Tools
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
queries: [{use_case: "your specific Browser Tool task"}]
session: {id: "existing_session_id"}
Step 2: Check Connection
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS
toolkits: ["browser_tool"]
session_id: "your_session_id"
Step 3: Execute Tools
RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL
tools: [{
tool_slug: "TOOL_SLUG_FROM_SEARCH",
arguments: {/* schema-compliant args from search results */}
}]
memory: {}
session_id: "your_session_id"
Known Pitfalls
- Always search first: Tool schemas change. Never hardcode tool slugs or arguments without calling
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS - Check connection: Verify
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSshows ACTIVE status before executing tools - Schema compliance: Use exact field names and types from the search results
- Memory parameter: Always include
memoryinRUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOLcalls, even if empty ({}) - Session reuse: Reuse session IDs within a workflow. Generate new ones for new workflows
- Pagination: Check responses for pagination tokens and continue fetching until complete
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 92 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 0115b3fa602e
browser-tool-automation is a skill published in the GitHub repository openteams-lab/openteams (612 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 728 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to ably-automation, differing in 24 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
computer-use
Read and drive native desktop applications through the accessibility layer — list on-screen apps, snapshot one window as a numbered element tree, then click / type / set a value / scroll / drag / run a named action, by element index or by screen coordinates. Use for work in a desktop app rather than a web page. Full…
feature-demo-recording
Record a demo video of a web feature from a real browser. Two modes -- a NARRATED film where measured voiceover drives the timeline (designed slides, subtitles, punch-in camera, rendered from an HTML timeline), and a SILENT evidence clip for a PR or a QA pass. Use when the user asks to record a video, demo, or screen…
browser-recording
Record a browser flow as a video/GIF for evidence — animations, transitions, and multi-step interactions that a still screenshot cannot prove. Drives the project's own Playwright through a bundled runner, then converts to mp4 + GIF via ffmpeg. Use when the user asks to record a demo, capture a GIF or video of the UI…
web-browse
Open a REAL external web page so the user can see it in Kiro Crew's Browser panel. PRIMARY path is the browser MCP tool (drives the built-in native panel); playwright-cli is the fallback for remote/plain-browser sessions and for attached logged-in browsers. Use when the user wants to VIEW / verify / "show me" an…
web-verify
Use after a user-visible UI edit to verify your OWN change on an isolated loopback server. Capture, read and show real screenshots. Backends: playwright-cli (live Browser panel), agent-browser (annotated frames, pixel diff, a11y), or scripted Playwright. Not web-preview or external-page web-browse.