Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-checkpoint-commitnpx skills add opsmill/infrahub-mcp --skill speckit-checkpoint-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-checkpoint-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-checkpoint-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-checkpoint-commit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-checkpoint-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- speckit-checkpoint-commit — 86% identical, 7 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/speckit.checkpoint.commit
Description
Stages all current changes and creates a commit with a descriptive message reflecting the work just completed. This command should be called by the agent at two points during the spec-kit workflow:
- After each pre-implementation step (constitution, specify, clarify, plan, analyze, tasks) — to capture the spec artifacts produced by that step.
- During implementation — at natural checkpoints, such as after completing a task or a logical group of related tasks from the task list.
When to Commit
Pre-Implementation Steps
Commit immediately after each of these steps completes:
- After constitution — commit the project principles and guidelines
- After specify — commit the requirements and user stories
- After clarify — commit the resolved clarifications
- After plan — commit the technical implementation plan
- After analyze — commit the consistency and coverage analysis
- After tasks — commit the task breakdown
During Implementation
Use the task list generated during the tasks step as a reference for when to commit. Good checkpoints include:
- Completing a single task from the task list
- Completing a logical group of closely related tasks
- Finishing a self-contained unit of work (e.g., a new component, a service layer, a set of tests)
The agent should use judgment — the goal is to produce commits that are meaningful and reviewable, not to commit after every single file change.
Workflow
- Determine a clear, concise commit message based on the work just completed
- Stage all current changes (
git add -A) - Commit with the message (
git commit -m "<message>")
Commit Message Guidelines
- For pre-implementation steps, use the step name as a prefix (e.g.,
constitution: establish project principles,tasks: break down implementation into actionable items) - For implementation commits, describe what was built (e.g.,
implement user authentication service,add product listing page and API routes) - Keep messages concise but descriptive enough to understand the scope of the commit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 58 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A c605eb5845c0
speckit-checkpoint-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository opsmill/infrahub-mcp (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 525 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
commit
Create git commits with good messages. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", or asks to commit changes.
senpi-qa
Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and npm test are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches /.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote…
commit
Generate git commit messages from staged changes.
tmux-manual-qa
Run a single manual tmux-based QA scenario for the todo continuation feature against the real CLI (./pi-test.sh) in an interactive TUI. Captures scrollback, asserts deterministic pass/fail count markers, and cleans up test fixtures. Use only for the manual-qa milestone features.
merge-upstream
Sync a fork branch with an upstream remote using a history-preserving merge. Use this whenever the user says /merge-upstream, merge upstream, sync upstream, sync fork, or wants upstream changes integrated without rebasing or force-pushing.
coding-agent-extension-worker
Implements a single feature in the pi-mono todotools builtin extension work. Use for refactoring, continuation runtime, config resolver, prompt builder, test authoring, golden snapshots, CHANGELOG entries, and harness helpers. Does NOT do manual tmux QA.