Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-git-validatenpx skills add opsmill/infrahub-mcp --skill speckit-git-validategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-git-validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-git-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit-git-validate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00492 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-git-validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to speckit-git-validate — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Validate Feature Branch
Validate that the current Git branch follows the expected feature branch naming conventions.
Prerequisites
- Check if Git is available by running
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null - If Git is not available, output a warning and skip validation:
[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch validation
Validation Rules
Get the current branch name:
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
The branch name must match one of these patterns:
- Sequential:
^[0-9]{3,}-(e.g.,001-feature-name,042-fix-bug,1000-big-feature) - Timestamp:
^[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}-(e.g.,20260319-143022-feature-name)
Execution
If on a feature branch (matches either pattern):
- Output:
✓ On feature branch: <branch-name> - Check if the corresponding spec directory exists under
specs/:- For sequential branches, look for
specs/<prefix>-*where prefix matches the numeric portion - For timestamp branches, look for
specs/<prefix>-*where prefix matches theYYYYMMDD-HHMMSSportion
- For sequential branches, look for
- If spec directory exists:
✓ Spec directory found: <path> - If spec directory missing:
⚠ No spec directory found for prefix <prefix>
If NOT on a feature branch:
- Output:
✗ Not on a feature branch. Current branch: <branch-name> - Output:
Feature branches should be named like: 001-feature-name or 20260319-143022-feature-name
Graceful Degradation
If Git is not installed or the directory is not a Git repository:
- Check the
SPECIFY_FEATUREenvironment variable as a fallback - If set, validate that value against the naming patterns
- If not set, skip validation with a warning
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 54 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A ab7656044903
speckit-git-validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository opsmill/infrahub-mcp (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 492 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to speckit-git-validate, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tensorpool-gpu-cloud
Safely inspect and operate TensorPool GPU clusters and jobs using the current tp CLI, with explicit approval before any billable or destructive action.
lambda-gpu-cloud
Safely inspect and operate Lambda Cloud GPU instances through the documented Cloud API and SSH, with explicit approval before billable or destructive actions.
runpod-gpu-cloud
Safely inspect and operate RunPod resources with runpodctl, live product data, and explicit approval before paid or destructive actions.
vast-ai-gpu-cloud
Safely inspect and operate Vast.ai marketplace instances with the vastai CLI, live offer data, and explicit approval before paid or destructive actions.
givemeanode-agent-compute
Operate GiveMeANode GPU nodes, batch jobs, storage, and rollout sandboxes through its connected MCP server with bounded spend, durable recovery, and explicit approval for paid or destructive actions.
senpi-qa
Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and npm test are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches /.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote…