Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oribarilan/97 --skill security-and-trust-boundariesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oribarilan/97Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oribarilan/97/security-and-trust-boundaries)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oribarilan/97/security-and-trust-boundaries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oribarilan/97/security-and-trust-boundaries/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oribarilan/97/security-and-trust-boundaries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oribarilan/97/security-and-trust-boundaries.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.03797 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01899 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00759 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00380 |
Grade B, and why
security-and-trust-boundaries scanned grade B with 3 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointmediumServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
5. **SSRF: don't fetch arbitrary URLs from input.** Server-side `requests.get(user_url)` lets the attacker pivot into your VPC, hit metadata services (`169.254.169.254`), and read internal endpoints. If you must fetch us Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
5. **SSRF: don't fetch arbitrary URLs from input.** Server-side `requests.get(user_url)` lets the attacker pivot into your VPC, hit metadata services (`169.254.169.254`), and read internal endpoints. If you must fetch us Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
2. **`shell=False` is the default; `shell=True` is a vulnerability.** Use `subprocess.run(["git", "clone", url], shell=False)` (argv form), not `subprocess.run(f"git clone {url}", shell=True)`. The argv form passes argum The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 119 lines · 50 tokens per session scan B 482f023e1dcb
security-and-trust-boundaries is a skill published in the GitHub repository oribarilan/97 (24 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 3,797 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 3 findings (cloud metadata endpoint, makes network calls, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
boundaries
Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.
triage
Triage review findings interactively — approve, skip, or prioritize each issue. Use after /phx:review to filter findings before fixing.
techdebt
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
great_cto
Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
skeptical-triage
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts. Use when the cost of a false-positive gate block exceeds the cost of 4 extra LLM turns.