Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/originprotocol/origin-dollar/optimize-ousd-allocationnpx skills add OriginProtocol/origin-dollar --skill optimize-ousd-allocationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OriginProtocol/origin-dollarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/originprotocol/origin-dollar/optimize-ousd-allocation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/originprotocol/origin-dollar/optimize-ousd-allocation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/originprotocol/origin-dollar/optimize-ousd-allocation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00170 | $0.04245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00085 | $0.02122 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00849 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00424 |
Grade A, and why
optimize-ousd-allocation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OUSD Allocation Optimizer
Autonomously find the OUSD collateral allocation that maximizes total annual USDC earnings across every bucket, then output an executable rebalancing plan. No user input required.
You produce a plan; you never execute moves. Relocating funds is a Strategist-multisig action. Deliverable = the net moves + expected $/yr gain, for a human to sign.
Base lineage: this skill merges a production-grounded rebalancer (the ousdConstraints gates, greedy step algorithm, freeze guards, spread-floor knowledge) with (a) an independent on-chain verification layer — we do not fully trust the MCP — (b) AMO coverage, (c) the sustainable-vs-transient rate correction, and (d) a persistent learning loop.
TODO — known gaps
- AMO realized APY not wired. No data source for the Curve OUSD/USDC AMO's fee+gauge yield. Hold AMO at its 10% floor; flag opportunity cost only. AMO-vs-Morpho yield tradeoffs are out of scope until closed.
The buckets
- Ethereum Morpho (chain 1) — MetaMorpho vault over Blue markets (OETH/USDC + others), OETH/USDC hard-capped at 90% util.
- Base Morpho (chain 8453) — cross-chain (CCTP), bridge-slow.
- HyperEVM Morpho (chain 999) — cross-chain (CCTP), bridge-slow.
- Curve OUSD/USDC AMO — redemption/peg liquidity; ≥10% of TVL floor. (Omitted by the base rebalancer — do not omit it; it's ~15% of collateral.)
- OUSD Vault buffer — idle USDC (0% APY) and the withdrawal queue.
Core principle — optimize dollars, and sustainable dollars
Objective: maximize TotalYield = Σ(balanceᵢ × APYᵢ) (annual USDC). Relocation keeps total AUM fixed, so this equals maximizing blended OUSD APY. Marginal APY only orders candidate moves; the accept/reject gate is always the global TotalYield delta — never a single strategy's rate.
Value each market at its sustainable rate (rate at 90% target utilization), not a transient spot spike. Withdrawing spikes a market's rate above target; that reverts within hours as borrowers repay. See references/methodology.md §3, §9. Do not credit a withdrawn source's remaining balance at its spiked rate — that's the classic bug that tells you to drain a market.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 157 lines · 170 tokens per session scan A d800cc6f5e6f
optimize-ousd-allocation is a skill published in the GitHub repository OriginProtocol/origin-dollar (151 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 170 tokens to every session and 4,245 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
analyzing-ethereum-smart-contract-vulnerabilities
Perform static and symbolic analysis of Solidity smart contracts using Slither and Mythril to detect reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, and other vulnerability classes before deployment to Ethereum mainnet.
web3-bug-classes
Complete reference for all 10 DeFi smart contract bug classes. Use this when hunting for specific vulnerability types, need attack patterns for accounting desync, access control, incomplete path, off-by-one, oracle manipulation, ERC4626 vaults, reentrancy, flash loans, signature replay, or proxy/upgrade bugs.
web3-methodology-research
External research synthesis from Trail of Bits, SlowMist, ConsenSys, Immunefi, and Cyfrin. Use this for advanced audit methodology, Echidna/Medusa fuzzing setup, Slither custom detector writing, attack pattern deep dives, or the 4-phase learning roadmap.
web3-poc-foundry
Complete Foundry PoC writing guide + all cheatcodes + DeFiHackLabs reproduction patterns. Use this when building a proof of concept exploit, setting up a fork test, using Foundry cheatcodes, or reproducing a known DeFi hack for learning.
web3-triage-report
Bug triage validation system, Immunefi report format, and 20 real paid bounty examples dissected. Use this when validating a finding before submitting, writing an Immunefi report, checking if a bug is actually valid, or studying real examples of paid vulnerabilities.