code-review

A code review workflow that checks changes for quality, security, and ease of maintenance, then reports findings by severity. It examines the changed files and uses separate review perspectives.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before merging a pull request, after implementing a major feature, or whenever you need a structured assessment of code changes.
Why use it?
It helps find important problems before code is merged or after a major feature is added. Severity ratings make it easier to distinguish urgent issues from lower-risk improvements.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/orinks/accessiweather/code-review
Any agent
npx skills add Orinks/AccessiWeather --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Orinks/AccessiWeather

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 12 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,233 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00012 $0.02233
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.01117
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00447
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00223

Measured 2d ago against content hash d1ac54a5ca6b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.codex/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 291 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 291 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Conduct a thorough code review for quality, security, and maintainability with severity-rated feedback.

When to Use

This skill activates when:

  • User requests "review this code", "code review"
  • Before merging a pull request
  • After implementing a major feature
  • User wants quality assessment

GPT-5.5 Guidance Alignment

  • Default to outcome-first progress and completion reporting: state the target result, evidence, validation status, and stop condition before adding process detail.
  • Treat newer user task updates as local overrides for the active workflow branch while preserving earlier non-conflicting constraints.
  • If correctness depends on additional inspection, retrieval, execution, or verification, keep using the relevant tools until the review is grounded; stop once enough evidence exists.
  • Continue through clear, low-risk, reversible next steps automatically; ask only when the next step is materially branching, destructive, credentialed, external-production, or preference-dependent.

Delegates to the code-reviewer and architect agents in parallel for a two-lane review:

  1. Identify Changes

    • Run git diff to find changed files
    • Determine scope of review (specific files or entire PR)
  2. Launch Parallel Review Lanes

    • code-reviewer lane - owns spec compliance, security, code quality, performance, and maintainability findings
    • architect lane - owns the devil's-advocate / design-tradeoff perspective
    • Both lanes run in parallel and produce distinct outputs before final synthesis
  3. Review Categories

    • Security - Hardcoded secrets, injection risks, XSS, CSRF
    • Code Quality - Function size, complexity, nesting depth
    • Performance - Algorithm efficiency, N+1 queries, caching
    • Best Practices - Naming, documentation, error handling
    • Maintainability - Duplication, coupling, testability
  4. Severity Rating

    • CRITICAL - Security vulnerability (must fix before merge)
    • HIGH - Bug or major code smell (should fix before merge)
    • MEDIUM - Minor issue (fix when possible)
    • LOW - Style/suggestion (consider fixing)

Read the full file on GitHub · 291 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 291 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A d1ac54a5ca6b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Orinks/AccessiWeather (24 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 2,233 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

agent-host-chat-contributions

Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.

microsoft/vscode · 56 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens