Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/debugnpx skills add Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp --skill debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/debug.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00708 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00354 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/debug — Diagnose and fix a failure
Purpose
Find and correct the causal defect rather than patching symptoms or cycling through speculative edits.
Invocation
/debug <symptom, failing command, error, or reproduction>
Accepted input
Observed and expected behavior, logs/errors, reproduction steps or command, environment, suspected area, and recent changes when known.
Prerequisites
A HarnessKit workspace and permission to run the relevant local reproduction and
tests. Read the configured maximum with harnesskit loop list.
Procedure
Follow .agent/loops/debug-loop.yml, counting one full
reproduce→investigate→hypothesize→experiment/fix→verify pass as one iteration:
- Reuse a supplied context capsule; otherwise apply
context-discoveryonce and construct a task-specific capsule before broad exploration. - Record expected/observed behavior, environment, and exact reproduction.
- Reproduce without editing. Reduce the case and trace the narrowest failing path.
- Maintain an evidence ledger and rank falsifiable hypotheses.
Apply
model-routing: a stable, localized reproduction may use standard/medium; retain heavy/high for ambiguous, cross-boundary, concurrent, security-sensitive, or repeatedly falsified investigations. - Run the highest-information controlled experiment, changing one variable.
- If evidence identifies the root cause, add a regression test and apply the smallest safe fix. Otherwise begin the next iteration with the new evidence.
- Verify the original reproduction, regression, adjacent behavior, and gates.
- Stop immediately on verified success. At
max_iterations, stop and return the ledger, remaining hypotheses, and next discriminating experiment.
Approval points
- Ask before destructive, networked, credentialed, production, expensive, or externally visible diagnostics.
- Requirement or public-contract changes return to
/specfor approval.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 73 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 48484f5ecacc
debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 708 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…