Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp --skill fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/fix — Fix blocking findings only
Purpose
Resolve blocking review findings with the smallest possible change.
Invocation
/fix
Accepted input
The list of blocking findings from /review.
Prerequisites
A completed review with blocking findings.
Procedure
- Take the blocking findings.
- Apply
code-quality-guidelinesso the fix does not create hidden coupling or fragile special cases. Loadarchitecture-guidelines,backend-guidelines, orfrontend-guidelineswhen the finding touches those surfaces. - Fix each with the smallest change that resolves it.
- Do no unrelated work, refactors, or polish.
- Re-run gates and confirm they pass.
Approval points
None; re-review after fixing.
Expected output
A minimal diff that clears all blocking findings, with green gates.
Failure behavior
If a fix requires scope beyond the spec, stop and escalate to /spec.
Completion checks
- Every blocking finding is mapped to a specific change or explicitly escalated.
- No non-blocking suggestion or unrelated cleanup entered the diff.
- Relevant regression tests and configured gates pass, with exact commands and
results reported before returning to
/review.
Agents and skills
Agent: implementer. Skills: minimal-diff, code-quality-guidelines;
surface-specific guideline skills when relevant.
Apply
context-discoverybefore broad scanning: use a supplied context capsule first; otherwise check context frontmatter freshness, read.agent/context/routing.md, load only relevant summaries, and verify critical claims against source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 51 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A eed817ef99bd
fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
gsd-ns-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
cleanup-code-inspections
Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.
superlint
This skill describes the mandatory standard operating procedure for using our internal SuperLint tool. Use this when tasks require fixing code quality issues according to corporate standards.