Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp --skill fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/fix — Fix blocking findings only
Purpose
Resolve blocking review findings with the smallest possible change.
Invocation
/fix
Accepted input
The list of blocking findings from /review.
Prerequisites
A completed review with blocking findings.
Procedure
- Take the blocking findings.
- Apply
code-quality-guidelinesso the fix does not create hidden coupling or fragile special cases. Loadarchitecture-guidelines,backend-guidelines, orfrontend-guidelineswhen the finding touches those surfaces. - Fix each with the smallest change that resolves it.
- Do no unrelated work, refactors, or polish.
- Re-run gates and confirm they pass.
Approval points
None; re-review after fixing.
Expected output
A minimal diff that clears all blocking findings, with green gates.
Failure behavior
If a fix requires scope beyond the spec, stop and escalate to /spec.
Completion checks
- Every blocking finding is mapped to a specific change or explicitly escalated.
- No non-blocking suggestion or unrelated cleanup entered the diff.
- Relevant regression tests and configured gates pass, with exact commands and
results reported before returning to
/review.
Agents and skills
Agent: implementer. Skills: minimal-diff, code-quality-guidelines;
surface-specific guideline skills when relevant.
Apply
context-discoverybefore broad scanning: use a supplied context capsule first; otherwise check context frontmatter freshness, read.agent/context/routing.md, load only relevant summaries, and verify critical claims against source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A eed817ef99bd
fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sync-bridge
Reviews and guides Chromium Sync Model API (DataTypeSyncBridge) implementations, including DataTypeStore persistence and forwards/backwards compatibility for sync specifics. Use when implementing or reviewing a DataTypeSyncBridge subclass, DataTypeStore usage, sync metadata persistence, conflict resolution, or…
sync-model-processor
Reviews changes to Chromium Sync model internals in components/sync/model/, including ClientTagBasedDataTypeProcessor, ClientTagBasedRemoteUpdateHandler, ProcessorEntity, ProcessorEntityMetadata, and ProcessorEntityTracker. Use when modifying or reviewing processor state transitions, entity metadata tracking, conflict…
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
gsd-ns-review
Invoke this Pi skill with /skill:gsd-ns-review.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…