Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add orlando-japan/claude-code-setting --skill prompt-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/orlando-japan/claude-code-settingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/prompt-engineering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/prompt-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/prompt-engineering.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01142 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prompt engineering
Prompts aren't magic incantations. They're specs for a system that happens to read English. Clarity, constraints, and structure matter more than clever phrasing.
The five-part frame
- Task — what you want done, stated concretely.
- Context — what the model needs to know that isn't in the task.
- Input — the actual content to operate on (clearly demarcated).
- Format — how you want the output structured.
- Examples (optional but powerful) — zero, one, or few shots of input → output.
Most bad prompts skip one or more of these. Most good prompts are boring and explicit.
Task
Be specific. "Summarize this" is vague. "Summarize this support ticket in 3 bullets, each ≤20 words, focusing on the customer's core problem and what they've tried" is specific.
Rule: if a human contractor couldn't deliver from your task description, the model can't either.
Context
Everything the model needs that isn't in the task:
- The persona (who is the model being, for what audience).
- The domain (what jargon is okay, what assumptions it can make).
- Constraints the model doesn't know from task alone.
- What not to do (negative constraints are often as important as positive ones).
Don't pad with irrelevant context. Every extra token is noise, cost, and distraction.
Input
Wrap the content in clear delimiters so the model knows where task ends and content begins:
<ticket>
{customer ticket text}
</ticket>
XML-style tags work well with Claude and are unambiguous. Use them.
Format
Tell the model exactly what the output should look like:
- JSON with specific fields.
- A markdown table with specific columns.
- A numbered list with exactly N items.
- "Only the final answer, no preamble."
Models default to conversational output. If you want structured, say so.
Examples
For non-trivial tasks, examples beat instructions:
Example 1:
Input: "I can't log in, it says my password is wrong"
Output: {"category": "auth", "severity": "medium", "next_step": "reset_password_flow"}
Example 2:
Input: "The app crashes when I open the orders page"
Output: {"category": "bug", "severity": "high", "next_step": "escalate_engineering"}
Now classify:
{new input}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 131 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 7b90603c521b
prompt-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository orlando-japan/claude-code-setting (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,142 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
guidance
Constrain LLM output with grammars; guarantee valid JSON.
outlines
Outlines: structured JSON/regex/Pydantic LLM generation.
instructor
Structured LLM outputs validated with Pydantic.
dspy
DSPy: declarative LM programs, auto-optimize prompts, RAG.
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.
llm-ops
LLM Operations -- RAG, embeddings, vector databases, fine-tuning, prompt engineering avancado, custos de LLM, evals de qualidade e arquiteturas de IA para producao.