Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring --skill assessmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/assessment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/assessment.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00898 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00449 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Assessment
Purpose
Given a component definition with service component rules and validation component checks, generate an OSCAL assessment that evaluates whether controls are satisfied based on the control-rule-check mappings.
This skill bridges the gap between what a component implements and whether those implementations actually satisfy the control requirements.
Concepts
- service component: implements controls directly (firewall, OS, middleware, application)
- validation component: verifies that service component rules are actually enforced (scanner, audit tool, monitoring agent)
- control-rule-check mapping: derived from component definition to show which checks validate which rules for which controls
- assessment result: compliance status (compliant/non-compliant) with evidence from validation checks
Main Tasks
- Load component definition (service and validation components)
- Extract control-rule mappings from service component
- Extract rule-check mappings from validation component
- Derive control-rule-check mappings
- Generate assessment table with mock data (for demo)
- Output assessment results in markdown or OSCAL format
Sub-skills
- assessment-table.md — Generate human-readable assessment table showing control compliance status
- mock-data.md — Create mock assessment data for demo purposes
Workflow
- Confirm the component definition source (file path or trestle workspace)
- Load component definition JSON or markdown
- Extract service component rules and their control mappings
- Extract validation component checks and their rule mappings
- Build control-rule-check mapping matrix
- For each control, evaluate compliance based on validation check results
- Generate assessment table with:
- Control ID and description
- Rule description
- Check method and description
- Compliance status (compliant/non-compliant)
- Evidence/findings
- Output in markdown table format
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 104 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A a86c91464b60
assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 898 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…