compliance-catalog

compliance-catalog is a skill for Claude Code from oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring. It costs 66 tokens per session (21,200 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A converter that turns a PDF containing a law, regulation, or industry standard into a validated OSCAL Catalog JSON file. OSCAL is NIST’s machine-readable format for organizing security and compliance requirements called controls.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to ingest a new compliance framework, regenerate a catalog from an updated PDF, or validate the resulting OSCAL file. It supports an iterative process for fixing extraction and structure problems.
Why use it?
Compliance PDFs are written for people, while software tools need consistent structured data. This extracts the document, builds the catalog, checks it against validation rules, and helps preserve control IDs when the source is revised.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it to ingest a new compliance framework, regenerate a catalog from an updated PDF, or validate the resulting OSCAL file. It supports an iterative process for fixing extraction and structure problems.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring --skill compliance-catalog
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for compliance-catalog

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for compliance-catalog

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-catalog.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 21,200 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.21200
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.10600
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.04240
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.02120

Measured 10d ago against content hash a19226313a5a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

compliance-catalog scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 17 executable files (scripts/analyze_pdf.py, scripts/build_author_prompt.py, scripts/build_fix_prompt.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/compliance-catalog/SKILL.md · 1,142 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Compliance Catalog

Convert a compliance document PDF into a validated OSCAL Catalog JSON through an iterative loop between a deterministic extraction script (generate.py) and a comprehensive validator (validate.py).

┌─ Catalog Agent (loop control, CONFIG edits, gap judgments) ────────────┐
│  ┌─ Deterministic Extraction Pipeline (scripts/) ────────────────────┐ │
│  │ PDF → text extract → structure parse → OSCAL emit                 │ │
│  │       → postprocess → validate (17 rules + trestle)               │ │
│  └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

  generate.py ──▶ catalog.json ──▶ validate.py
      ▲                                │
      └── FIX_GUIDANCE tells you which ─┘
          function of generate.py to edit

What is an OSCAL Catalog, and what counts as a control

An OSCAL Catalog is NIST's machine-readable representation of a compliance document. OSCAL defines a control as "a requirement or guideline, which when implemented will reduce an aspect of risk related to an information system and its information" — not simply "a numbered thing in the document." A catalog groups controls under group (the document's own Parts / Chapters / Schedules), and each control's textual content lives in a part named statement.

This matters because compliance PDFs almost always contain numbered units that are not controls under this definition: definitions sections, purely administrative articles (commencement dates, amending formulas, short titles), and similar non-normative text. The final catalog.json you deliver must not contain these units — only genuine requirements. See "Extraction is requirement-agnostic; exclusion is a separate, reviewable step" below for the two-pass mechanism (excluded_units.json) that achieves this without weakening the extraction itself.

What Phase 2's FIRST generate.py run does, unaffected by the paragraph above: extract every numbered unit in the PDF as a control, exactly as this document already instructs — extraction stays mechanical and complete. The removal of non-requirement units happens in a later, separate step (Phase 2's second generate.py run, after excluded_units.json is written). The OSCAL definition above explains why the catalog is organized as controls-under-groups and why statement is the right place for extracted prose — it does not change what the first pass extracts.

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,142 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 1,142 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A a19226313a5a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

compliance-catalog is a skill published in the GitHub repository oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 21,200 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens