Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring --skill compliance-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-mapping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring/compliance-mapping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.04859 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.02429 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00972 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00486 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Mapping
Map controls between two OSCAL Catalogs and emit an OSCAL Mapping Collection. The system separates adaptive agent judgment (threshold selection, parallelism decisions) from a deterministic pipeline (ingest, embedding-based candidate generation, scoring, aggregation, emission). All semantic judgment (relationship/confidence/coverage) is performed by subagents you spawn — no external LLM API is ever called. Embedding and nearest-neighbor search run locally via sentence-transformers and FAISS (no API key required).
┌─ Mapping Agent (you: orchestration) ────────────────────────────────┐
│ ┌─ Deterministic Pipeline (scripts/) ────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Ingest → (Stage 2: reserved) → Blocking → Judge → Score │ │
│ │ → Aggregate → Emit → Validate + Report │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Note on stage numbering. Stages are numbered 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (no Stage 2) so this file lines up with the 8-stage numbering used on the downstream branch, where Stage 2 (Granularity Align) is inserted between Ingest and Blocking. The OSS variant here does not run Stage 2 — controls are compared at their input granularity — so the number is simply skipped.
Trigger
Use this skill when asked to map/compare controls between two compliance frameworks expressed as OSCAL Catalogs, or to produce/update an OSCAL Mapping Collection.
Inputs
source_catalog(required): Path to the source-side OSCAL Catalog JSON (the framework whose controls you are trying to show coverage for).target_catalog(required): Path to the target-side OSCAL Catalog JSON (the reference framework).output_dir(required): Directory to write all intermediate and final artifacts.mapping_spec(optional): Path to a JSON/YAML profile (seescripts/mapping_spec.py) overriding thresholds, relationship vocabulary, or blocking K. If omitted, built-in defaults are used (confidence≥0.75, coverage≥0.15, K=20).
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- apm.yml 1.0 KB
- LICENSE.txt 11 KB
- scripts/aggregate.py 4.5 KB runs code
- scripts/blocking.py 3.9 KB runs code
- scripts/build_judge_prompt.py 6.8 KB runs code
- scripts/chunk_judge_tasks.py 3.3 KB runs code
- scripts/embedding_utils.py 4.9 KB runs code
- scripts/emit_oscal.py 9.8 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_report.py 7.9 KB runs code
- scripts/ingest_normalize.py 3.9 KB runs code
- scripts/internal_model.py 2.3 KB runs code
- scripts/judge_apply.py 6.5 KB runs code
- scripts/judge_prep.py 4.1 KB runs code
- scripts/mapping_spec.py 2.5 KB runs code
- scripts/requirements.txt 103 B
- scripts/run_judge_pipeline.sh 6.0 KB runs code
- scripts/score_calibrate.py 3.3 KB runs code
- scripts/template.html 50 KB
- scripts/validate_oscal.py 3.3 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 220 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A e9f1f2da9bd7
compliance-mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository oscal-compass/agentic-agile-authoring (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 4,859 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…