What the reviewer found
The project's own e2e test suite for the 'codes' CLI. All curl/POST calls target a localhost test server the suite itself starts (127.0.0.1:19876), and 'rm -rf "$TEST_DIR"' cleans up a mktemp'd test directory created earlier in the same module.
example-or-fixture— an example or test fixture
What was read
The file as it ships in ourines/codes:
.claude/skills/codes-e2e-test/SKILL.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
E1Sends data to an external URL — false positiveSC2Downloads and executes remote code — false positiveRMRecursive force delete — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.