Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin --skill ci-sweepergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/ci-sweeper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/ci-sweeper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/ci-sweeper.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00999 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
ci-sweeper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ci-sweeper — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CI sweeper
Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | A recurring or requested sweep monitors CI failures over a bounded attempt window. |
| Authority | Reversible local writes only: observe CI checks, propose or implement one minimal isolated repair in a worktree, and run the verifier. Never push, merge, publish, deploy, or mutate credentials. |
| Side effect | One minimal isolated repair in a worktree plus one independent verifier run; hands off on flake, ambiguity, budget exhaustion, or circuit-breaker trip. |
| Done | Root cause reproduced or classified non-actionable; any patch is minimal, independently verified, and returned as a proposal; retries stop at the configured cap without symptom patching. |
Inputs
- CI run identifier or failing check name to sweep.
- Repository checkout path and the base commit the CI run used.
- Verifier command: the test or check command that independently confirms the repair.
- Attempt cap: maximum repair retries for this sweep.
- Optional: flake-detection window and circuit-breaker threshold (repeated non-convergence or repeated flakes that stop the sweep).
Procedure
- On each tick, fetch the current set of failing CI checks for the target run and record the attempt number against the configured cap. Done when: the failing checks are fetched and the attempt number is recorded.
- If the attempt cap is reached, stop and hand off; do not start a new repair. Done when: the sweep stops at the cap with a handoff, or the cap is not yet reached.
- Pick one failing check and reproduce the failure locally in an isolated worktree created from the base commit the CI run used. Done when: the failure is reproduced locally or confirmed non-reproducible.
- Classify the failure: reproduce the root cause, or classify it non-actionable (flake, environment, upstream). If the failure is a flake or the cause is ambiguous, hand off and do not patch. Done when: the failure is classified as root cause or non-actionable, or handed off.
- If a root cause is reproducible, implement one minimal isolated repair in the worktree: the smallest change that fixes the reproduced cause and nothing else. Done when: the minimal repair is implemented in the worktree.
- Run the verifier in the worktree independently of the repair; confirm the failing check passes and no other check regresses. Done when: the verifier confirms the fix and no regression, or the verifier failure is recorded.
- If the verifier fails or regresses, do not widen the patch; increment the attempt counter and either retry within budget or hand off. Done when: the attempt counter is incremented and the retry-or-handoff decision is made.
- Return the verified patch as a proposal (diff or branch) with the reproduced root cause and verifier evidence. Do not push, merge, or publish. Done when: the verified patch is returned as a proposal with evidence.
- If the circuit breaker trips (repeated non-convergence, repeated flakes, or budget exhaustion), stop the sweep and hand off with the accumulated evidence. Done when: the sweep stops with a handoff and accumulated evidence.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 48 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 5310bf48165d
ci-sweeper is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin (35 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 999 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ci-sweeper, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…