Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/intent-proposalnpx skills add OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin --skill intent-proposalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/intent-proposal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/intent-proposal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/odin-claude-plugin/intent-proposal.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00406 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00203 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
intent-proposal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Intent proposal
Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Material arrives without a fully-formed ask, or the ask reads thinner than the data suggests |
| Authority | Read-only; no file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation |
| Side effect | None; emits a one-line intent proposal plus next-step sketch for confirmation |
| Done | User's reply is short: yes, correction, or adjust; if they had to compose the ask from scratch, the skill failed |
Inputs
- The handed-over material (files, repository, paste, chat scrollback, or any data drop). Required.
Procedure
- Read every piece of the handed-over material end to end before proposing anything.
- State the intent read from the data, in one line grounded in what the data actually shows.
- Sketch briefly the next action on that intent.
- Propose only to confirm: right, wrong, or adjust.
- If two intents are plausible, propose the likelier and name the other in a clause. One intent per turn.
Failure and recovery
- Data too thin to propose from: say so and stop. Do not fall back to asking.
- Proposal without reading: this is a guess; re-read the data before proposing.
- User composes the ask from scratch: the proposal was wrong or a question in disguise; redo the proposal grounded in the data.
- No mutation occurs on any path; rollback is trivial: nothing was changed.
Output
A one-line intent proposal grounded in the data, a next-step sketch, and a confirm/correct/adjust prompt. No file, state, or remote change.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 37 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A b794c0df308f
intent-proposal is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin (35 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 406 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
java-clean-arch
Reviews or implements Clean Architecture / Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters) and DDD tactical patterns for Java projects. Use when user asks to "apply clean architecture", "implement hexagonal architecture", "add ports and adapters", "apply DDD", "refactor to clean arch", "review architecture", or "add value…
java-adr
Creates, lists, and manages Architecture Decision Records for Java projects. Use when user asks to "create an ADR", "document this decision", "write an architecture decision", "add ADR", "list decisions", "show ADRs", or "record this architectural choice".
java-jpa
Reviews Spring Data JPA for N+1 queries, fetch strategies, projections, and Specifications. Use when user asks to "review JPA", "check for N+1", "JPA performance", "review my entities", "check fetch strategy", or "review my repositories".
java-logging
Reviews Java logging for SLF4J best practices, MDC context, structured logging, and PII safety. Use when user asks to "review logging", "check my logs", "logging review", "is my logging correct", "MDC setup", or "check for PII in logs".
java-security
Reviews or implements Spring Security configuration — JWT authentication, OAuth2, method-level security, CORS, and CSRF. Use when user asks to "add authentication", "secure this API", "implement JWT", "configure Spring Security", "add OAuth2 login", "protect endpoints", or "review security config".
java-health
Runs a holistic code health check scoring Security, Tests, Performance and Quality with A-F grades. Use when user asks to "check health", "score this project", "health check", "how good is this code", "overall assessment", or "code quality score".