Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/outlinedriven/odin-codex-plugin/to-prdnpx skills add OutlineDriven/odin-codex-plugin --skill to-prdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-codex-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/odin-codex-plugin/to-prd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/odin-codex-plugin/to-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/odin-codex-plugin/to-prd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00069 | $0.00982 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00491 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
to-prd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- to-prd — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Synthesize a PRD from what you already know. Do NOT interview — extract from context, codebase exploration, and prior decisions. Iterate the artifact in place; commit when the user signs off.
Emission Modes [LOCKED]
Default (file mode): Write to <project-root>/docs/prd/<feature>.md. Idempotent — overwrite on rerun. Use file mode when no flag is passed, when working offline, when the repo has no GitHub remote, or when the user explicitly wants a tracked file.
Flag mode (--emit-issue): Submit via gh issue create --title "PRD: <feature>" --body-file <tmp>. Use only when the user explicitly opts in or the project's convention is issue-tracked PRDs (check <project-root>/CONTRIBUTING.md and .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/).
When ambiguous, default to file mode and ask the user one targeted question rather than guessing.
Process
1. Reuse priming if available; explore only when context is thin
If conversation context already covers domain language, naming conventions, and module shape, skip discovery and proceed to step 2. Otherwise dispatch an Explore agent over the codebase. Goal: current architectural state, naming conventions, ADRs, domain language. Read CONTEXT.md, AGENTS.md, docs/adr/, and any UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md. Use fd -e md . docs/ then bat -P -p -n -r for targeted reads.
2. Identify deep modules
Sketch modules to build or modify. Prefer deep modules — large functionality behind a narrow, stable interface — over shallow modules. Surface 3-7 candidates and their interfaces. Recommend which modules deserve isolated tests; defer to user on edge cases.
3. Verify intent only when blocked
If the module breakdown is unambiguous from prior context, skip this step and proceed to writing. Ask the user only when an axis (scope, depth, or test coverage) is genuinely unresolved or when a decision is reversible-but-costly. Surface one unresolved axis at a time with a recommendation; never ask three default-bound axes at once.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 77 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 987bfc065b09
to-prd is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/odin-codex-plugin (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 982 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-guardrails-claude-code
Install a Claude-Code PreToolUse hook that blocks destructive git commands (push variants including force-push, hard reset, force clean, branch -D, checkout/restore overwrites) before Bash runs them. Use when the user wants git safety rails, force-push prevention, or repository-wipe protection.
duet
Two-party posture — user as director, agent as executor; every fork, tradeoff, or choice surfaced via batched AskUserQuestion with a recommended default. Use when the user invokes /duet, says "ask before" / "pair with me" / "human-in-the-loop", or for aesthetic/architectural/irreversible decisions.
explore
Read-only codebase exploration: discovery, structural reading, and emission of architecture/pattern/tooling/dependency summaries. Use to understand existing code, map files, trace function flow, locate symbols, or build pre-implementation context. Uses a staged 1/3/5 Explore-agent escalation protocol scaled to scope.…
deps-upgrade
Dependency-upgrade campaign — outdated scan, batch-by-severity, breaking-change remediation, lockfile audit. Use when CVEs require remediation, when a major upstream version lands, when stack compatibility forces a sweep, or on a scheduled (quarterly) hygiene cadence. CVE-driven bumps consume security audit findings…
type-driven
Type-driven development. Use when developing with refined types, state machines encoded in types, or proof-carrying types; enforces totality and exhaustive pattern matching.
design-by-contract
Design-by-Contract (DbC) development. Use when implementing with formal preconditions, postconditions, and invariants across any language.