Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development --skill atomic-issues-prsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/atomic-issues-prs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/atomic-issues-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/atomic-issues-prs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/atomic-issues-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/atomic-issues-prs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01599 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00640 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00320 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
atomic-issues-prs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Atomic issues and PRs
Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | User says "atomic PRs" or requests one issue/PR per logical change. |
| Authority | Remote: creates branches, commits, issues, and pull requests on a remote GitHub repository; requires explicit human invocation. Preview the target repo and consequence before creating them. |
| Side effect | Creates branches, commits, issues, and pull requests on a remote GitHub repository. Never force-pushes or pushes to protected branches without explicit user authorization. |
| Done | One issue or PR per logical change on the correct base/head, links appended, URLs reported. |
Inputs
Required: a working tree containing the change-set to publish and a gh-authenticated GitHub account.
Optional: per-unit routing overrides (issue+PR vs PR-only) stated by the user; dependency order among units.
Procedure
- Run
gh auth status. If unauthenticated, stop and ask the user to rungh auth login. - Resolve the canonical (upstream) slug before any permission check. Read remotes with
git remote -v; pick the contribution target asupstreamif present, elseorigin. Detect a fork relationship withgh repo view <slug> --json nameWithOwner,parent,defaultBranchRef; a non-nullparentmeans the canonical slug isparent.nameWithOwner. If there is no clear single upstream (noupstreamremote and ≥2 plausible non-origin candidates, orgh's detectedparentdisagrees with theupstreamremote) ororiginhas genuinely diverged from upstream (no common merge-base, ororiginwas re-created/renamed/renewed), prompt the user for the target repo. Plain fork-behind, whereoriginis merely behindupstreamwith a shared merge-base, is not ambiguity and must never prompt. - Query permission on the canonical slug:
gh repo view <canonical-slug> --json viewerPermission.viewerPermission∈ {ADMIN, MAINTAIN, WRITE} ⇒ direct mode; otherwise ⇒ fork mode. Record the canonical default base branch fromdefaultBranchRef. - Group working-tree changes into atomic units by mechanism/file boundary: one concern per unit. Never bundle unrelated changes. Commit the whole set into N atomic commits first, running the repo-native type-checker and linter before each commit. Each unit becomes one self-contained commit, which allows per-unit branches to be created by cherry-picking. Never re-stage a dirty tree, which would let later units swallow earlier diffs. Present the unit→commit list to the user, then proceed.
- Route each unit by whether it changes observable behavior: behavior-affecting → Issue + linked PR, because a tracking issue gives the change a changelog/discussion anchor; mechanical → PR-only, because a self-explanatory change needs no separate tracking. Honor an explicit per-unit override if the user states one; otherwise route silently.
- Resolve the push URL once, by URL not remote name, to avoid undefined targets and remote-name collisions. Direct mode: push URL =
https://github.com/<canonical-slug>. Fork mode: fork owner =gh api user --jq .login; fork slug =<login>/<repo>. Iforiginalready points to a prior personal fork whose owner ≠ canonical owner and ≠ the authenticated login, print a non-blocking warning noting the account mismatch; do not stop the run. If the fork does not exist, create it withgh repo fork <canonical-slug> --clone=falseand note the fork slug in the output. Push URL =https://github.com/<fork-slug>. - For each unit, in dependency order:
- Create the branch and cherry-pick the unit commit. Independent unit:
git branch <branch> <canonical-default-base>thengit cherry-pick <unit-commit>; PR bases on<default>. Dependent unit in direct mode: parent-ref = the prerequisite unit's already-pushed branch; PR bases on that branch (a stacked PR); cherry-pick only this unit's commit so no prerequisite is lost. Dependent unit in fork mode: cross-fork stacking cannot be expressed (a fork PR's base must be a branch in the canonical repo), so flatten onto<canonical-default-base>and prefix the PR body with a warning line naming the prerequisite unit and noting the dependency was flattened; the compromise is never silent. git push <push-url> <branch>:refs/heads/<branch>(same form both modes; only the URL differs).gh pr create --repo <canonical-slug> --body-file <tmp>. Direct mode:--base <parent-ref> --head <branch>; fork mode:--base <default> --head <fork-owner>:<branch>; capture PR#M.- If the unit routed to Issue + linked PR:
gh issue create --repo <canonical-slug> --title "<summary>" --body-file <tmp>with a body that references PR#M; capture#N. - Amend the PR body by appending
Closes #Nto the PR's existing body. Reuse the body-file from step 3 (append the line and rewrite the file) or fetch the current body first withgh pr view <M> --json body; then write it withgh pr edit <M> --repo <canonical-slug> --body-file <amended-tmp>.gh pr edit --body-filereplaces the whole body, so never write a bareCloses #Nas the entirety of it. - Emit the issue/PR URLs; move to the next unit.
- Create the branch and cherry-pick the unit commit. Independent unit:
- For PR-only routed units (no issue filed in step 4), skip the issue-create and body-amend steps entirely; no dangling
Closes. Done when: every logical unit has the correct issue/PR routing, base and head, links, and reported URLs.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 075a9907bbca
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 8ae3f75b1172
atomic-issues-prs is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development (53 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,599 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
gait-session-tracking
GAIT session lifecycle management - branch creation, turn recording, audit logging for every NetClaw operation. Use when starting a new NetClaw session, recording a health check or config change, pinning a pre-change baseline, or viewing the audit trail for a troubleshooting session.
effect-ledger
Record an effect, sign an effect, reconcile an effect or check "did this PR merge" through the signed AIWG effect ledger, using one aiwg effect command with scriptable exit codes.
development-scheduler
A workflow for coordinating multi-role coding work through Herdr, a task scheduler, and repo-harness sessions. It assigns implementation, review, and handoff tasks while checking permissions and evidence.
publish-branch
Use when asked to publish the checked-out branch: commit and push it on whatever branch it is, the default branch included. Not for creating branches, PRs, force pushes, or pushing any other branch; when the request excludes the default branch, use commit-push-current.
git-history-analysis
Use when the user asks about recent engineering work, what the team is working on, planning or roadmap material, or an explicitly requested Slack summary. Not for remote or irreversible changes.