Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/attack-shapenpx skills add OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development --skill attack-shapegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/attack-shape)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/attack-shape"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/outlinedriven/outline-driven-development/attack-shape.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01086 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00543 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
attack-shape scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- attack-shape — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Attack shape
Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | User wants adversarial stress-testing of an architecture, structure, or shape. Either the agent attacks and the human defends, or the agent proposes and the human attacks. |
| Authority | Read-only. No file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation. The agent emits chat output only. |
| Side effect | An attack or proposal transcript in chat, plus the surviving or broken shape recorded in chat. |
| Done | The shape has been attacked from both directions, the human has defended or attacked, and the surviving shape (or non-converged record) is recorded. |
Inputs
The proposed architecture, structure, or shape to test. The human must supply it as text, a diagram description, or a reference to an artifact already in context. Without it the skill stops.
Optional: named attack axes the human wants prioritized (coupling, abstraction depth, failure modes, scalability, ownership boundaries).
Optional: a scope limit naming what is out of bounds for the attack.
Optional: constraints, scale, existing components, and non-goals for a proposal round.
A human participant must be present; the skill does not converge without one.
Procedure
-
Restate the target shape from the supplied input and confirm scope with the human before attacking or proposing. Do not test material outside the stated scope. Done when: the shape is restated and scope is confirmed.
-
Determine the direction. If the human supplied a shape to attack, the agent attacks and the human defends. If the human asked the agent to propose, the agent proposes and the human attacks. Done when: the direction is set and the first move is made.
-
Enumerate the attack axes relevant to the shape: coupling between parts, abstraction depth versus leakage, failure and recovery paths, scalability and growth pressure, ownership and boundary clarity, plus any named axes the human supplied. Done when: all relevant axes are enumerated.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 66 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 144617ce75b4
attack-shape is a skill published in the GitHub repository OutlineDriven/outline-driven-development (52 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,086 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
outlines
Guarantee valid JSON/XML/code structure during generation, use Pydantic models for type-safe outputs, support local models (Transformers, vLLM), and maximize inference speed with Outlines - dottxt.ai's structured generation library.
brainstorm
Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only plan. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, think through scope, decide what to build, or needs collaborative product framing before planning, not for a decisive verdict on whether to adopt or switch to a specific external technology, library, or…
doc-review
Use when the user asks to review or critique a prose planning document — a plan, spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design doc.
drift-detect
Use when the user says "plan drift", asks whether the roadmap, plans, or docs still match the code, or is deciding what to rebuild when restarting a stalled project. For doc-vs-code drift inside a specific diff, use sync-docs.
setup-gitignore
Use when the user says set up gitignore, fix gitignore, or untracked files keep appearing. Writes or merges .gitignore under stable section anchors and proves reruns produce no diff. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
enhance
Audit and tighten agent/plugin surfaces. Use when the user asks to enhance a plugin config, agent definition, skill, or CLAUDE.md.