Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/owainlewis/blueprint/codex-issue-coordinatornpx skills add owainlewis/blueprint --skill codex-issue-coordinatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/owainlewis/blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owainlewis/blueprint/codex-issue-coordinator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owainlewis/blueprint/codex-issue-coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owainlewis/blueprint/codex-issue-coordinator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.02241 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01120 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00448 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
codex-issue-coordinator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex issue coordinator
Use one Codex thread to coordinate a GitHub issue batch. Give each active issue its own worker thread, worktree, branch, and pull request. Workers hold implementation context. GitHub holds dependency state.
Explicitly naming /codex-issue-coordinator, or explicitly telling the
coordinator that agents may merge, authorizes in-scope workers to merge their
own pull requests after every merge gate below passes. An implicit skill match
does not grant merge authority: run in no-merge mode unless the user's words
grant it.
Neither mode authorizes deployment, release publication, destructive
operations, branch-protection bypasses, or changes outside the supplied batch.
Preconditions
- Read the repository instructions, parent issue, native sub-issues, declared dependencies, project board, issue state, and linked open or merged pull requests. A merged pull request is only evidence of completion when it closes or explicitly references the issue and its final change and proof satisfy the issue scope. Reconcile that issue and project state instead of dispatching it again. Do not infer completion from a link alone.
- Use Codex thread tools. If visible Codex threads and Codex-managed worktrees are unavailable, stop. Do not replace workers with hidden subagents.
- Make every issue a complete task before dispatch. If a missing product or technical decision could change behavior, data, security, compatibility, operations, cost, or proof, mark that issue as needing human input.
- Build a dependency graph. Treat GitHub as the durable source of issue, pull request, review, and merge state. Stop for human correction if the graph contains a dependency cycle. Do not create a second local tracker.
- Default to two active workers. Use another limit only when the user asks or the repository gives a stricter limit.
Coordinator workflow
- Keep the calling thread as coordinator. Name it
#<parent> Coordinatorwhen the batch has a parent issue. Useset_thread_pinnedto pin it at the start of every new or resumed coordinator run, before inspecting or dispatching workers. - Reuse an existing active worker for the same issue. Inspect an unclear or interrupted worker before creating another. If the issue already has an open pull request, create or resume its worker on that pull request's exact head branch and include the branch and pull request URL in its prompt. Otherwise create a Codex project thread in a managed worktree from the latest remote default branch and include the required new branch name.
- Name every worker
#<issue-number> <short title>. - Start only issues whose prerequisites are merged. Independent issues may run together up to the worker limit. Do not stack dependent branches in this workflow.
- Give the worker the full issue URL, dependency state, repository location,
resolved branch and pull request state, and the worker contract below. Tell
it to use
/task-to-prand pass the coordinator's explicit merge or no-merge mode. Merge mode grants authority only for that worker's issue. - Monitor workers with compact
wait_threadssnapshots. Useread_threadonly when a worker needs help. Send decisions or corrected scope back withsend_message_to_thread; do not edit the worker's files from the coordinator. - Continue independent work when one issue is blocked. After three failed attempts at the same check or review finding, pause that issue, record the evidence on GitHub, and request human input.
- In merge mode, when a worker reports completion, verify GitHub says the pull request is merged, the issue contains final proof, and the issue is closed. Close it explicitly if the merged pull request did not close it. Then mark the issue Done when the project supports it and archive the worker thread. In no-merge mode, stop that worker after its pull request passes all agent-completable gates, leave the issue in Review, record any pending human approval or merge as its blocker, and leave the thread available.
- Refresh the dependency graph after every merge and dispatch newly ready issues from the updated remote default branch. In no-merge mode, when a dependent issue is waiting only for a passing prerequisite pull request to be merged, record that human-merge dependency as its blocker. Do not wait indefinitely or dispatch the dependent from an unmerged branch.
- In merge mode, finish only when every in-scope issue is merged, closed, and Done when the project supports that state, or every unfinished issue has a recorded blocker that needs human action. In no-merge mode, finish when every in-scope issue has a ready pull request with all agent-completable gates passing or a recorded human blocker.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 187 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 504ca3407516
codex-issue-coordinator is a skill published in the GitHub repository owainlewis/blueprint (375 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,241 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-complete-milestone
Archive completed milestone and prepare for next version.
release-archivist
Close out a spec-superflow change with verification, summary, and archive readiness. Invoke when implementation is complete, verification is underway, or the user asks for a final wrap-up.
github
GitHub CLI operations via gh for issues, PRs, Actions, releases, and REST/GraphQL API with --json/--jq parsing. Triggers on: "create an issue", "submit a PR", "check CI status", "why did CI fail", "merge a PR", or pasted GitHub URLs.
leanspec-pr-lifecycle
Manage a lean-spec PR after it's been pushed — spec-issue linking, CI triage, review-comment discipline, merge-conflict recovery on open PRs, webhook subscription, and CHANGELOG follow-through on merge. Triggers include "CI is failing", "check is red", "link this issue", "Closes vs Part of", "respond to review"…
speckit-prd
Collaboratively turn a raw product or technical idea into three artifacts — a lean PRD, a technical roadmap with a SPEC catalog, and a roadmap-MOC home note — ready for $speckit-scaffold-spec and $speckit-autopilot. Use when the user says: "write a PRD", "$speckit-prd", "create a product requirements document", "draft…
speckit-status
Show the current SpecKit roadmap and workflow status in Codex. Aggregates workflow files and technical roadmaps, highlights active specs, identifies blocked work, and recommends the next unblocked spec to start.