task-decomposition

task-decomposition is a skill for Claude Code from Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills. It costs 16 tokens per session (491 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for breaking a large user goal into smaller tasks that separate agents can handle. It covers ordered, parallel, hierarchical, conditional, and iterative ways to divide work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to design multi-agent workflows, list subtasks, map dependencies, identify the critical path, and decide which tasks can run at the same time.
Why use it?
It makes complex work easier to assign and coordinate by showing dependencies, decision points, and the sequence that controls completion time.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the design-agent-orchestration plugin — 7 skills, 3 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to design multi-agent workflows, list subtasks, map dependencies, identify the critical path, and decide which tasks can run at the same time.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills --skill task-decomposition
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install design-agent-orchestration, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills, 3 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for task-decomposition

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for task-decomposition

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/ai-design-skills/task-decomposition.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 491 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00016 $0.00491
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00246
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00098
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00049

Measured 10d ago against content hash dc5a67253136, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

task-decomposition scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

claude-plugin/design-agent-orchestration/skills/task-decomposition/SKILL.md · 37 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 37 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Task Decomposition

Users come with goals, not subtasks. Task decomposition is how a multi-agent system breaks a complex user goal into pieces that individual agents can handle — and then reassembles the results into something coherent.

Decomposition Strategies

  • Sequential decomposition: Break the goal into ordered steps. Step 1 must complete before Step 2 starts.
  • Parallel decomposition: Break the goal into independent parts that can be worked on simultaneously.
  • Hierarchical decomposition: Break the goal into sub-goals, then break each sub-goal into tasks.
  • Conditional decomposition: The next step depends on the result of the current step. Different results lead to different paths.
  • Iterative decomposition: Start with a rough version, then refine through multiple passes.

Designing Decomposition Rules

For each type of user goal the system handles:

  • What's the entry point? How does the system receive the goal?
  • What are the subtasks? List all possible subtasks for this goal type.
  • What are the dependencies? Which subtasks depend on others' outputs?
  • What's the critical path? Which sequence of subtasks determines the minimum completion time?
  • What can be parallelised? Which subtasks can run simultaneously?
  • What's the reassembly logic? How do subtask results combine into the final output?

Granularity

How finely to decompose matters:

  • Too coarse: Single agents get tasks that are too complex, leading to lower quality
  • Too fine: Overhead from handoffs exceeds the benefit of specialisation
  • Just right: Each subtask matches one agent's sweet spot in terms of scope and complexity

Handling Ambiguity

User goals are often ambiguous. The system needs to:

  • Clarify before decomposing: Ask the user to specify when the goal is unclear
  • Decompose tentatively: Start with a plan and adjust as information emerges
  • Recompose when needed: If decomposition was wrong, restructure without starting over

Read the full file on GitHub · 37 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 37 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A dc5a67253136

Subscribe to this mod's changes

task-decomposition is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills (172 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 491 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens