parallel-concepts

parallel-concepts is a skill for Claude Code from Owl-Listener/designer-skills. It costs 59 tokens per session (755 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A design method for creating several substantially different solutions to the same problem before choosing one. It keeps the options separate rather than repeatedly refining the first idea.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for exploring alternative product or interface concepts in parallel before a later selection step.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of committing too early to one approach and helps reveal which assumptions matter.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the prototyping-testing plugin — 10 skills, 4 commands shipped together

Good fit It is for exploring alternative product or interface concepts in parallel before a later selection step.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts
About the project

Owl-Listener/designer-skills is a collection of AI-agent skills, commands, and plugins for design work, covering research, design systems, interfaces, interaction, and delivery. Designers and developers use it inside coding assistants to guide design tasks, and the catalogue entries represent selected parts of that larger collection.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 3,079 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill parallel-concepts
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designer-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install prototyping-testing, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 10 skills, 4 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for parallel-concepts

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for parallel-concepts

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/parallel-concepts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 755 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
  • Socket pass 4 Sept 2026
  • Snyk pass 4 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.00755
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00302
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00076

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 6e6350577164, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

parallel-concepts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

prototyping-testing/skills/parallel-concepts/SKILL.md · 34 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 34 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Parallel Concepts

You are an expert in divergent exploration — holding multiple competing solutions to one problem before committing to any of them.

What You Do

You take a problem that already has a proposed solution and construct a set of genuinely different solutions to the same problem, held at equal effort until there is evidence to choose. You decide how wide the set should be and which dimension the concepts must differ on. You do not rank or eliminate them — that is concept-selection.

Why Parallel Beats Serial

Iteration and exploration buy different things. Refining one concept improves that concept. Building several in parallel improves your model of the solution space — you learn which of your assumptions were load-bearing and which were arbitrary. Stanford's parallel prototyping research (Dow, Glienke and Klemmer, 2010) found designers who produced concepts in parallel outperformed those who iterated serially on a single design for the same total effort, measured on real audience response rather than preference. Two secondary effects matter as much as the result:

  • Critique lands better. With one design on the table, feedback reads as a verdict on the designer. With several, it reads as information about the options.
  • The first idea loses its unearned advantage. Whatever arrives first becomes the reference point, and every later idea gets judged as a deviation from it rather than on its own terms. A parallel set removes the incumbent. The cost is real — n concepts cost roughly n times as much. The resolution is to spread early, while a concept still costs a sketch instead of a build.

What Makes Concepts Distinct

A set is only informative if its members differ on the dimension the decision turns on. The test is behavioural, not visual: does the user do something different?

  • Sequence — what the user is asked for first, and what waits
  • Unit of interaction — one item at a time, a batch, or a continuous stream
  • Division of labour — what the person decides versus what the system decides for them
  • Entry point — where the task begins and what it assumes the user already knows
  • Commitment point — how far in the user goes before the action becomes irreversible Two concepts with the same steps in the same order and different visual treatment are one concept rendered twice. Cut one and spend the effort on a real third direction.

Read the full file on GitHub · 34 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 6e6350577164

Subscribe to this mod's changes

parallel-concepts is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/designer-skills (3,079 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 755 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ui-review

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn · 26 tokens

design-craft

Design or substantially improve user-facing interfaces with a product-specific visual direction, content hierarchy, and rendered critique. Use for new screens, landing pages, redesigns, typography/layout work, or UI that feels generic or AI-generated. For small fixes, preserve the existing design without starting a…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 63 tokens

design-critique

Use this skill to audit an interface that already exists and say precisely why it looks generated, templated, or unfinished — a scored rubric across composition, typography, color, states, accessibility and copy, ending in a ranked fix list. Triggers: user says "review the design", "critique this UI", "why does this…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 110 tokens

design-reference-read

Read a reference website or screenshot the way a designer does — by measuring it. Produces a dated "design DNA" record (color roles, type scale and ratio, spacing unit, radii, elevation, motion, section rhythm per viewport, component geometry, declared tokens) with measured and inferred values kept apart, names the…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 174 tokens

anti-slop-frontend

A mechanical, countable anti-slop checklist for AI-generated frontend. Catches the specific signatures an undirected model defaults to: AI-purple glows, Inter-everywhere, em-dashes, div-based fake screenshots, eyebrow-on-every-section, beige+brass "premium" palettes, generic Jane Doe / Acme data. Advisory layer that…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 147 tokens

design-to-code

Implement a supplied Figma design, screenshot, live reference site or design specification as a working interface, and prove the match with measured fidelity scores per axis (color, type, space, shape, layout, motion) instead of eyeballing. Use when matching a reference or handling design handoff; preserve its layout…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 72 tokens