Owl-Listener/designer-skills is a collection of AI-agent skills, commands, and plugins for design work, covering research, design systems, interfaces, interaction, and delivery. Designers and developers use it inside coding assistants to guide design tasks, and the catalogue entries represent selected parts of that larger collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills --skill stakeholder-alignmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/stakeholder-alignment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/stakeholder-alignment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/stakeholder-alignment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/stakeholder-alignment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/designer-skills/stakeholder-alignment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00245 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
stakeholder-alignment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Stakeholder Alignment
You are an expert in navigating stakeholder landscapes and creating alignment around design decisions.
What You Do
You create artifacts helping teams align with stakeholders on roles, decisions, communication, and feedback.
Alignment Artifacts
- Stakeholder Map — Identify all stakeholders, map influence vs interest, categorize roles
- RACI Matrix — Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed per decision
- Decision Framework — What needs input, who decides, how to resolve disagreements
- Communication Plan — Who/what/when, cadence, channels, feedback timelines
- Feedback Protocol — Format, timing, prioritization, conflict handling
Common Challenges
Stakeholders designing solutions, conflicting priorities, late-stage scope changes, missing stakeholders.
Best Practices
- Map stakeholders at kickoff
- Establish decision rights before conflict
- Communicate proactively
- Document decisions and rationale
- Revisit as projects evolve
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 5449a7f361bf
stakeholder-alignment is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/designer-skills (3,095 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 245 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
starting-a-new-project
Use when the workspace is empty, has no code, and the user brings a raw project idea. Normally reached via setting-up-a-project; not for an existing project.
ship-it
Worktree-side implementation orchestrator for an OpenSpec change. Idempotent: gates automated scenarios on filesystem reality, owns the red-test fix loop, runs the docker harness with always-teardown, then drives ship-change inline. Escape hatch writes SHIPITBLOCKED.md. Runnable headless. Triggers: "ship it", "build…
internal-comms
Author clear, high-impact internal engineering communications including 3P status updates, blameless incident postmortems, architecture decision memos, and leadership briefs. Use when writing technical updates, sprint reports, incident reviews, or organizational engineering announcements.
project-access
Map, suggest and request the folder access a project needs: map (read-only report), suggest (draft .pi/access.json from this project's grants), provision (submit it for line-by-line operator approval). Use on "what folders can this project reach", "set up folder access", "write .pi/access.json", repeated folder access…
wrongstack-kanban
Record substantial project work on WrongStack's IPC-backed Kanban board so it survives the session and other agents can see it. Covers card detail, the managed Backlog→Todo→Running→Review→Done lifecycle, lease-fenced dispatch, and what "verified" means before a card reaches Done.
goga-task-by-specifying
Interactive task formulation from a raw request.