Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00426 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00213 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Inclusive Interaction Audit
Run a comprehensive audit of how an interface supports diverse input methods, output channels, and physical abilities.
Process
Phase 1: Keyboard Pass
Using keyboard-navigation, attempt every task using only the keyboard. Document: unreachable elements, focus order issues, missing focus indicators, keyboard traps, and missing skip links.
Phase 2: Touch and Pointer Pass
Using touch-target-design, measure all interactive elements. Document: undersized targets, insufficient spacing, precision-dependent interactions, and missing tap alternatives.
Phase 3: Input Alternatives Check
Using multi-modal-input and gesture-alternatives, verify that every interaction has at least two input methods. Document: single-input dependencies, disabled paste fields, gesture-only features, and missing alternatives for complex interactions.
Phase 4: Feedback and Motion Check
Using feedback-and-status and motion-sensitivity, verify that all feedback reaches multiple senses and that motion is safe. Document: colour-only indicators, missing screen reader announcements, dangerous motion, and prefers-reduced-motion support.
Output
Present findings as a structured report:
- Summary — overall interaction accessibility rating and critical blockers
- Input method matrix — table showing which tasks work with which input methods (keyboard, pointer, touch, voice)
- Issue list — each issue with severity, affected input method, affected users, and specific fix
- Prioritised fixes — ranked by number of users unblocked
Severity definitions:
- Critical — a task cannot be completed with a common input method
- Major — a task is significantly harder with certain input methods
- Minor — friction exists but the task can be completed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 51 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 398f7edade22
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills (98 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 426 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.